Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

29
I'd go to the moon in a nanosecond, the problem is we don't have the technology to do that anymore. We used to but we destroyed that technology and it's a painful process to build it back again. (www.bitchute.com)
posted 3 years ago by MOCKxTHExCROSS 3 years ago by MOCKxTHExCROSS +30 / -1
44 comments share
44 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (44)
sorted by:
▲ 1 ▼
– DavidColeIntrepid 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

But flat earth research isn’t degeneracy nor encouraging of it.

There is no "research". You twist words like a communist. You say empirical evidence doesn't matter.

But it doesn’t encourage f*cking kids

Yes it does. It proposes that everything is relative to your personal perspective, just like "minor attracted people" think they're one of a hundred genders.

manifest external reality

Exactly what I said

The objective facts support that the world is not, and cannot, be the shape we are taught.

If you've ever used a map before you would know this is complete bullshit

heretic

Commie

skeptic

Saying objective reality depends on your feelings isn't being "skeptical" it's what a child with downsyndrome does

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– jack445566778899 0 points 3 years ago +1 / -1

There is no "research".

Says the person that flatly refuses to research the subject. Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance. You could recognize that there IS research, AND engage in it if you only chose to. Or you can continue to remain ignorant. So it is with most every topic/subject - right?

You say empirical evidence doesn't matter.

When did I say that? Can you provide/cite an example of that?

I say the absolute opposite. Empirical (i.e. scientific) evidence is what matters most!

Yes it does

Now you’re just being silly. If you actually think encouraging independent research is the same as encouraging pedophilia/degeneracy - you are one sick puppy. Independent research skills are critical to being a capable student, and human being. F*cking kids, on the other hand - makes you a monster/demon.

It proposes that everything is relative to your personal perspective, just like "minor attracted people" think they're one of a hundred genders.

As I’ve said already, we are in agreement. This “objective reality is what I feel like it is” is a degenerate scam and an attack on science (as well as the children :()

I don’t say anything like this, which is why you can’t find any example of me doing so. I say the opposite!

Exactly what I said

Right, and I said as well! I hope you now recognize that we are agreeing with one another, and you are mistaken about my perspective (and/or have mistaken me for someone else)!

If you've ever used a map before you would know this is complete bullshit

You are being silly again. Maps are tools for use, nothing more. They don’t contain, nor do they need to, the shape of the entirety of the world. Even topographical maps, which do contain SOME of that detail do not contain its entirety and measure elevations in regards to sea level (not the shape of the world)! This is a common, and popularized, misconception! There is a LOT to research about this subject, but you won’t ever recognize that if you choose not to engage in the research yourself (and stop playing witting/unwitting apologist)!

Commie

I am against commies. You have no examples to support your claim, which is why you fail to provide any.

Saying objective reality depends on your feelings isn't being "skeptical"

Again, we are in agreement! I don’t do anything of the sort, and never have or would!

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - nxltw (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy