Not quite, wasn't it set up for a few factors. Potentially war. But then would Nato have responded there. No, chance. They weren't organised in Ukraine. They built arms into it by the downing of the Malaysian flight.
Ukraine kicked off during the Arab spring, Syria, and Libya.
Literal containment. Suspecting then, it would've been far different had Russia gone directly into the Ukraine, after the coup. A much more sanctioned Russia, contained. Potentially it would've also caused Syria to be toppled. Running off. What would it have done to distribution then? Not as much as today.
Instead it delayed the geopolitical board for another narrative. Where Ukraine suddenly became this much larger producer of propaganda, because all of sudden it's making a bunch of bullshit. Then like another prop, it's used for causing shortages and redistributing more baloney. Suddenly everybody needs the inflatables. You will pay triple for electricity, or you will eat bugs.
War would be easier. Instead of those that profit, profit regardless.
Yes, but action, causes reaction. The board aligns from causality. It isn't certain. How can it be unless they're all in on it. They are because trade and money. What is the result if simple profit is forcing the cause and the effect. Agenda. Until I don't even think the strategy is human at this point, rather it is crunched into supercomputers making predictions and rigging any affect, possibly based on human actions. Where it becomes easier to force policy, causing strategy, and agenda.
Of course it lays a course. But how often does it deviate. Buy time, rig, force. Calculated undoubtedly but you need more than a plan A, because at what point does plan B get thrown in.
If it's decades ahead why did it buy time. Russia bought time. Trump bought time. At the same time both played, forcing it, causing it to react more. Like perhaps COVID. Until today's agenda of the inflatables, dunno how anybody still calls them renewables. Prior Obama used deflection. Smoke Ukraine, Ukraine was unheard of prior, it amounted to a lot less global supply than it does now, but a fire in Syria etc. Clearly distraction, or deflection, but obviously part of the agenda. The Arab spring caused Ukraine to supply a lot more globally as Europe entered with increasing Corps forcing demand. But during the Euromadien, it also caused Russian output, Russia started generating far more gas, and oil.
Not quite, wasn't it set up for a few factors. Potentially war. But then would Nato have responded there. No, chance. They weren't organised in Ukraine. They built arms into it by the downing of the Malaysian flight.
Ukraine kicked off during the Arab spring, Syria, and Libya.
Literal containment. Suspecting then, it would've been far different had Russia gone directly into the Ukraine, after the coup. A much more sanctioned Russia, contained. Potentially it would've also caused Syria to be toppled. Running off. What would it have done to distribution then? Not as much as today.
Instead it delayed the geopolitical board for another narrative. Where Ukraine suddenly became this much larger producer of propaganda, because all of sudden it's making a bunch of bullshit. Then like another prop, it's used for causing shortages and redistributing more baloney. Suddenly everybody needs the inflatables. You will pay triple for electricity, or you will eat bugs.
War would be easier. Instead of those that profit, profit regardless.
It's not a trigger, it's a set-up.
These people literally plan 10 to 20 years ahead.
It has been in Bolshevist Russia and Colonialist China and will always be.
Yes, but action, causes reaction. The board aligns from causality. It isn't certain. How can it be unless they're all in on it. They are because trade and money. What is the result if simple profit is forcing the cause and the effect. Agenda. Until I don't even think the strategy is human at this point, rather it is crunched into supercomputers making predictions and rigging any affect, possibly based on human actions. Where it becomes easier to force policy, causing strategy, and agenda.
Of course it lays a course. But how often does it deviate. Buy time, rig, force. Calculated undoubtedly but you need more than a plan A, because at what point does plan B get thrown in.
If it's decades ahead why did it buy time. Russia bought time. Trump bought time. At the same time both played, forcing it, causing it to react more. Like perhaps COVID. Until today's agenda of the inflatables, dunno how anybody still calls them renewables. Prior Obama used deflection. Smoke Ukraine, Ukraine was unheard of prior, it amounted to a lot less global supply than it does now, but a fire in Syria etc. Clearly distraction, or deflection, but obviously part of the agenda. The Arab spring caused Ukraine to supply a lot more globally as Europe entered with increasing Corps forcing demand. But during the Euromadien, it also caused Russian output, Russia started generating far more gas, and oil.
Not all is as it seems. Who knows what it all is?