Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

27
posted 3 years ago by throwaway_27_ 3 years ago by throwaway_27_ +44 / -17
660 comments share
660 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (660)
sorted by:
▲ 6 ▼
– Esuomyonana 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

The study of aeronautics accomplishes this. It's a mix of fluid mechanics and dynamics.

There's engineers who will never come out as FE or even question the shape. I'm a failed engineer myself, never cost anyones life though.

Buoyancy helps with movement. This is how boats float, it's how planes fly with lift.

volume = mass / density

So density = mass / volume

It's all related.

Mass is real so isn't volume.

You want an equation that suggests density over acceleration of g, equivalent to 9.8 m/s^2 or 32 ft/s^2

The problem with your question is it depends on the medium your moving through and at what angle. That's why I suggested aeronautics.

Objects tend to fall slower in water because there's more drag.

9.8 m/s^2 is basically junk physics because it just describes what can occur in a vacuum.

You did just get me thinking about why an object would fall faster in a near vacuum. If gravity is fake, it has to be because the mass is denser than that near empty space. I don't know if gravity is fake, just shooting out ideas. But given that the moon mission was likely faked, we honestly don't have a lot of other planetary bodies to run these types of experiments. on. I believe it mostly theoretical at this point.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– brahbruh 1 point 3 years ago +2 / -1

Why do you say you are a failed engineer? Did you just give up on the career path and move on?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Esuomyonana 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

I say it because that's what I am. I like telling people the truth about reality.

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - j6rsh (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy