Haven't read his book yet. Videos are oral, and unsourced. Though they are, I have confirmed many of his conclusions through my own peek into history. Story-teller with a general scope on human history, with a focus on white/aryan ancestry, hovering in the area since after the fall of Kem, but dips into more ancient history from time.
Touches upon National Socialist view of history, and also mentions suspicions regarding occult tech, such as UFOs and their bases in Antarctica and South America/Argentina.
Decent overview, though objective and a little sterile (lack of personal attachment to ancestry), it's/he a good resource to get an introductory view of the past.
I am unfamiliar with this person. What is the quality of his research?
Haven't read his book yet. Videos are oral, and unsourced. Though they are, I have confirmed many of his conclusions through my own peek into history. Story-teller with a general scope on human history, with a focus on white/aryan ancestry, hovering in the area since after the fall of Kem, but dips into more ancient history from time.
Touches upon National Socialist view of history, and also mentions suspicions regarding occult tech, such as UFOs and their bases in Antarctica and South America/Argentina.
Decent overview, though objective and a little sterile (lack of personal attachment to ancestry), it's/he a good resource to get an introductory view of the past.
Ouch. Historical research done to further a political ideology is a non-starter for me.
Look at it the other way round:
There's mainstream view of history
There's alternative views on history