Well the hard part is simply getting it out of earths atmosphere. Once out, there’s no air or wind resistance or anything so it doesn’t matter. Send it on its way, make minor course adjustments, and then you’re at the moon. Landing would be tricky no doubt but not out of the realm of possibility.
People who don’t believe in the moon landing make some good points, but “the lunar lander looks bad” is not one of them
Plausible after all the simulations they ran I think so. Should there be ground blown away? How much? I don’t know at what height their last jet thrusts were to control their landing so it’s hard for me to say that without more info.
I have not seen it but would be willing to watch it. Is there somewhere you know of that I can get it? I much prefer documentaries that at least feign interest in presenting both sides as they can often be pretty convincing regardless of truth when only presenting one side of a story.
You don’t need to push off of anything. The act of shooting out energy from the ship causes the ship to go in the opposite direction. The ship moving in the opposite direction of the thruster is the equal and opposite reaction
Well the hard part is simply getting it out of earths atmosphere. Once out, there’s no air or wind resistance or anything so it doesn’t matter. Send it on its way, make minor course adjustments, and then you’re at the moon. Landing would be tricky no doubt but not out of the realm of possibility.
People who don’t believe in the moon landing make some good points, but “the lunar lander looks bad” is not one of them
yes it does sound very plausible and very possible
Plausible after all the simulations they ran I think so. Should there be ground blown away? How much? I don’t know at what height their last jet thrusts were to control their landing so it’s hard for me to say that without more info.
I have not seen it but would be willing to watch it. Is there somewhere you know of that I can get it? I much prefer documentaries that at least feign interest in presenting both sides as they can often be pretty convincing regardless of truth when only presenting one side of a story.
Well I suppose that does make sense when you put it like that lol. Thanks
How would you make adjustments with no atmosphere you would have to push off of something to get an equal and opposite reaction
You don’t need to push off of anything. The act of shooting out energy from the ship causes the ship to go in the opposite direction. The ship moving in the opposite direction of the thruster is the equal and opposite reaction
The problem with morons is they get to post questions that even a child knowing basic physics can answer.
Go read some books fuckwit.
Space is fake and you don’t understand physics
I’m interested in your explanation of how gps works
"you don’t understand physics"
Says the guy who used 'atmosphere' when talking about maneuvering a capsule in space.