How could the state of one (thing) represent no (thing)?
Next lame post, please. Entertain me better.
Your choice to want (next, please) represents the consent towards others to enter and tame (entertain) your mind with suggested information. This direction tempts towards death; while the formerly ignored need would represent the growth of life...hence making it "better".
you work for free
"Arbeit macht frei" aka Work (energy) will set you free (free will of choice).
fuckyourgods
Unless you're a sodomite; that would imply making more of them...yet if you are a sodomite; then that would imply making less of yourself.
I rather keep my eyes on those suggesting to look at little kids.
pretending to be
To be (perceiving) implies out of (perceivable); so it's about reacting to perceivable; while resisting the temptation of others pretending to suggest anything.
You worship a dead jew
a) I resist choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law; while struggling to adhere to perceivable balance (offer) to choice (response) natural law.
b) the ship allegory represents being a temporary formed vessel (life) within ongoing flow (inception towards death).
your opinions are worthless.
Perceivable balance represents predefined value; perceiving choice represents responding evaluation. Evaluation (choice) cannot define value (balance)...only transmute it temporarily.
All propositions (opinions) ignore that all perceivable is already available to each one perceiving it within.
How could the state of one (thing) represent no (thing)?
Your choice to want (next, please) represents the consent towards others to enter and tame (entertain) your mind with suggested information. This direction tempts towards death; while the formerly ignored need would represent the growth of life...hence making it "better".
"Arbeit macht frei" aka Work (energy) will set you free (free will of choice).
Unless you're a sodomite; that would imply making more of them...yet if you are a sodomite; then that would imply making less of yourself.
Thanks. Like everyone else here, internet points are what I'm after. They give me power!!!!!!
Thanks. I love me, too.
Aw, look at the little kid here, pretending to be smart. LOL You worship a dead jew. So your opinions are worthless.
I rather keep my eyes on those suggesting to look at little kids.
To be (perceiving) implies out of (perceivable); so it's about reacting to perceivable; while resisting the temptation of others pretending to suggest anything.
a) I resist choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law; while struggling to adhere to perceivable balance (offer) to choice (response) natural law.
b) the ship allegory represents being a temporary formed vessel (life) within ongoing flow (inception towards death).
Perceivable balance represents predefined value; perceiving choice represents responding evaluation. Evaluation (choice) cannot define value (balance)...only transmute it temporarily.
All propositions (opinions) ignore that all perceivable is already available to each one perceiving it within.
You wrote all that for me? I must be hitting a nerve with my pick ax of truth.
You didn't read any of that for yourself? Ignorance is indeed bliss.