The Stew Peters video looks more like he's trying defend his decision to publish the information. I watched the first six minutes. Am I correct in interpreting that Stew Peters initially took down the first episode about this person because it seemed fake?
Thanks for all your work. In your view, has any part of it been corroborated?
I don't know about Stew Peters. I think McGreevey is perfectly honest and very well-informed, yes. I have noted lots of corroboration, but not tried to document it. Info I regard as well-corroborated and reliable is published to my Cyberthal blog, existential threads partially excepted.
We need to question everything he says with who, what, when, where, why and how. He have to think critically, get him to name names and vigilantly seek out contradictions.
The Stew Peters video looks more like he's trying defend his decision to publish the information. I watched the first six minutes. Am I correct in interpreting that Stew Peters initially took down the first episode about this person because it seemed fake?
Thanks for all your work. In your view, has any part of it been corroborated?
I don't know about Stew Peters. I think McGreevey is perfectly honest and very well-informed, yes. I have noted lots of corroboration, but not tried to document it. Info I regard as well-corroborated and reliable is published to my Cyberthal blog, existential threads partially excepted.
We need to question everything he says with who, what, when, where, why and how. He have to think critically, get him to name names and vigilantly seek out contradictions.
I added substantial corroborating evidence to the post, on the two Feds who tortured him.
Good luck, and remember that this isn't a puzzle, it's a war.