How can a suggested word have meaning; when it originates out of perceivable sound?
Notice also the resulting reasoning (true vs false conflict) over meanings for almost every suggested word; plus the nonstop revisionism of suggested meaning and the all encompassing contradicting of suggested meaning by the parasitic few upon the ignorant many.
primitive predecessor
PRIM'ITIVE, adjective [Latin primitivus; from primus, first.] * PREDECES'SOR from PROE (before) and DECEDO (to depart). The predecessor of departed words (hence shaped by different choices out of same sound) represents sound communicated from flow (inception towards death) towards form (life).
The parasitic few suggest words to tempt the many to ignore perceived sound; just like the suggestion of "insane person" tempts them to reason about wanting vs not wanting to be insane; instead of comprehending that "in sanus" (within sound) and "per sonos" (by sound) implies being within; by; out of and therefore in response to perceivable sound.
It refers to founder.
FOUND (to come to) -ATION (through action); which implies being the reaction (form) enacted (flow) upon. The choice to shape words for suggestion represents the reaction to enacted sound perceived, and it also tempts others to ignore perceived (reality) for suggested (fiction); which is what the parasitic few utilize to to suggest meaning (idolatry); redefine it (revisionism) and contradict both sides reasoning about suggested meanings (talmudic reasoning).
Is it the suggested jew vs Gentile or the perceivable GENERATED (gentile) YOU (jew)? jew/you/few or UR/you are represents kabbalistic phonetics aka the free will of choice by the few to shape suggested words that the many ignore perceivable sound for. Who makes the choice to ignore reality (need) for fiction (want)?
Sorry bot,
BOT; ROBOT; ROBORATION (from Latin robur) - "strength". Why feel sorry for the strength of others instead of using them as inspiration to grow your strength?
How can a suggested word have meaning; when it originates out of perceivable sound?
Notice also the resulting reasoning (true vs false conflict) over meanings for almost every suggested word; plus the nonstop revisionism of suggested meaning and the all encompassing contradicting of suggested meaning by the parasitic few upon the ignorant many.
PRIM'ITIVE, adjective [Latin primitivus; from primus, first.] * PREDECES'SOR from PROE (before) and DECEDO (to depart). The predecessor of departed words (hence shaped by different choices out of same sound) represents sound communicated from flow (inception towards death) towards form (life).
The parasitic few suggest words to tempt the many to ignore perceived sound; just like the suggestion of "insane person" tempts them to reason about wanting vs not wanting to be insane; instead of comprehending that "in sanus" (within sound) and "per sonos" (by sound) implies being within; by; out of and therefore in response to perceivable sound.
FOUND (to come to) -ATION (through action); which implies being the reaction (form) enacted (flow) upon. The choice to shape words for suggestion represents the reaction to enacted sound perceived, and it also tempts others to ignore perceived (reality) for suggested (fiction); which is what the parasitic few utilize to to suggest meaning (idolatry); redefine it (revisionism) and contradict both sides reasoning about suggested meanings (talmudic reasoning).
Is it the suggested jew vs Gentile or the perceivable GENERATED (gentile) YOU (jew)? jew/you/few or UR/you are represents kabbalistic phonetics aka the free will of choice by the few to shape suggested words that the many ignore perceivable sound for. Who makes the choice to ignore reality (need) for fiction (want)?
BOT; ROBOT; ROBORATION (from Latin robur) - "strength". Why feel sorry for the strength of others instead of using them as inspiration to grow your strength?