I honestly did not read everything you have written, so forgive my ignorance.
I just want to say that in my experience it is directly related to the training and mental state the person has, it does not matter if white, black, mexican, chinese.
You can get all of them acting exactly as you described in the portion I read.
Training and mental state are key to every difference you can find outside of natural intelligence, so not all are equal, but all have pretty much the same bits and when in a proper motivated environment and learning properly, all people excel.
Training and mental state are key to every difference you can find outside of natural intelligence, so not all are equal.
What if everyone's is different; domestication of free will is used to train understanding aka standing under suggested information, and nature is about each different ingredient to grow comprehension of all perceivable inspiration (communicated through sameness)?
all people excel
What if form (life) within flow (inception toward death) represents temporary growth within ongoing loss, and what if the parasitic few use suggestion to direct ignored growth forwards towards what the few want the many to grow for them?
What if you are just a dumb bot cherry picking illogical segments of communication and attempting to block peoples thought with them on silly nonsensical issues?
a) how could an implication (if/then) block thought; unless already blocked by reason (want vs not want; true vs false; believing vs not believing etc.) beforehand?
b) does "free-will-of-choice" sound like an attempt to block thinking?
c) logic (reason) represents conflict (want vs not want) over suggestion; while ignoring perception. Illogical would imply resisting the temptation to reason about suggested fiction; while ignoring perceived reality.
d) "nonsensical issues" ignores that perceiving an issue through senses contradict the suggested judgment of "nonsense".
e) "a dumb bot"...what's so DUMB, adjective - "mute; silent; not speaking" about BOT; ROBOT (Latin roboro, robur, strength)?
Wait a sec...silent strength? As in...
"People talking without speaking"..."People hearing without listening"
"People writing songs that voices never share"..."No one dared"
"Disturb the sound of silence"
That sound must have some bad ass mf strength if no one dared?
f) "cherry picking" or utilizing free will of choice to meticulously go at the contradictions within suggested information; while pointing out the ignored inspiration the contradictions were shaped out of? You may only see a cake with a cherry on top; while I comprehend the alchemy of baking the suggestion of "the cake is a lie".
beat it
"no one wants to be defeated"...aka choosing to not want a suggestion.
"It doesn't matter who's wrong or right"...aka perceived need sustains matter; not the want (right) vs not want (wrong) reasoning about suggestions.
"just beat it" refers to the temptation to fall for suggested information (want) over perceived inspiration (need).
"You have to show them that you're really not scared" aka resisting suggestions.
"You're playin' with your life, this ain't no truth or dare" aka sustenance of life (need) over temptation (want vs not want) luring towards death.
"They'll kick you, then they beat you, then they'll tell you it's fair"...aka it was your fault all along; goys, we are just healing the world.
"So beat it, but you wanna be bad" ..."And the whole world has to answer right now"..."Just to tell you once again who's bad?"
EnoughOfYourLies
A lie represents the contradiction of a suggested truth previously consented to. Nature neither lies; nor does it communicate truth...others suggest you affixed states aka true (want) or false (not want) to tempt you to ignore adapting to perceived change (need).
What if instead of judging others as bots; you try to express yourself as human; then learn from the consequences?
I honestly did not read everything you have written, so forgive my ignorance. I just want to say that in my experience it is directly related to the training and mental state the person has, it does not matter if white, black, mexican, chinese.
You can get all of them acting exactly as you described in the portion I read.
Training and mental state are key to every difference you can find outside of natural intelligence, so not all are equal, but all have pretty much the same bits and when in a proper motivated environment and learning properly, all people excel.
What if everyone's is different; domestication of free will is used to train understanding aka standing under suggested information, and nature is about each different ingredient to grow comprehension of all perceivable inspiration (communicated through sameness)?
What if form (life) within flow (inception toward death) represents temporary growth within ongoing loss, and what if the parasitic few use suggestion to direct ignored growth forwards towards what the few want the many to grow for them?
What if you are just a dumb bot cherry picking illogical segments of communication and attempting to block peoples thought with them on silly nonsensical issues?
Beat it.
a) how could an implication (if/then) block thought; unless already blocked by reason (want vs not want; true vs false; believing vs not believing etc.) beforehand?
b) does "free-will-of-choice" sound like an attempt to block thinking?
c) logic (reason) represents conflict (want vs not want) over suggestion; while ignoring perception. Illogical would imply resisting the temptation to reason about suggested fiction; while ignoring perceived reality.
d) "nonsensical issues" ignores that perceiving an issue through senses contradict the suggested judgment of "nonsense".
e) "a dumb bot"...what's so DUMB, adjective - "mute; silent; not speaking" about BOT; ROBOT (Latin roboro, robur, strength)?
Wait a sec...silent strength? As in...
"People talking without speaking"..."People hearing without listening"
"People writing songs that voices never share"..."No one dared"
"Disturb the sound of silence"
That sound must have some bad ass mf strength if no one dared?
f) "cherry picking" or utilizing free will of choice to meticulously go at the contradictions within suggested information; while pointing out the ignored inspiration the contradictions were shaped out of? You may only see a cake with a cherry on top; while I comprehend the alchemy of baking the suggestion of "the cake is a lie".
"no one wants to be defeated"...aka choosing to not want a suggestion.
"It doesn't matter who's wrong or right"...aka perceived need sustains matter; not the want (right) vs not want (wrong) reasoning about suggestions.
"just beat it" refers to the temptation to fall for suggested information (want) over perceived inspiration (need).
"You have to show them that you're really not scared" aka resisting suggestions.
"You're playin' with your life, this ain't no truth or dare" aka sustenance of life (need) over temptation (want vs not want) luring towards death.
"They'll kick you, then they beat you, then they'll tell you it's fair"...aka it was your fault all along; goys, we are just healing the world.
"So beat it, but you wanna be bad" ..."And the whole world has to answer right now"..."Just to tell you once again who's bad?"
A lie represents the contradiction of a suggested truth previously consented to. Nature neither lies; nor does it communicate truth...others suggest you affixed states aka true (want) or false (not want) to tempt you to ignore adapting to perceived change (need).
What if instead of judging others as bots; you try to express yourself as human; then learn from the consequences?