Comments (22)
sorted by:
Michalusmichalus 15 points ago +15 / -0

The people that took that shit, and are still taking that shot defend it the worse. It's like defending their abuser. Especially when they are suffering from the side effect profile.

Zap_Powerz [S] 10 points ago +10 / -0

I cant tell you how many stories Ive read about parents that insisted their child get the clot shots, the kid has a negative side effect or dies and the parents still say everyone needs to get the shots. Mind blowing.

Undernourish 4 points ago +4 / -0

A special place in hell...

JackArrow 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah, I put them in the same category with the abortionists. Child sacrifices to Moloch/Baal, unknowingly.

King_of_Crazy 10 points ago +10 / -0

Stockholm Syndrome.

EstebanVargas69 5 points ago +5 / -0

With a side of munchausen by proxy

Michalusmichalus 2 points ago +2 / -0

Deep denile too.

Dorktron4Runner 13 points ago +13 / -0

Ha! The science seems a little squishy.

weezkitty 10 points ago +10 / -0

Brought to you by the same people who believe men can become women

Soperp 8 points ago +9 / -1

they're not all biologists

pkvi 5 points ago +5 / -0

NINE different terrorists reporting


VicariousJambi 4 points ago +4 / -0

could just be gpt-3 and https://thispersondoesnotexist.com/

pkvi 2 points ago +2 / -0

Expand on that please.

VicariousJambi 3 points ago +3 / -0

How do you know that the people writing these articles are real people and not just ai generated personas.

pkvi 2 points ago +2 / -0

While there are a lot of seemingly AI gen content regurgitating keywords, from my diving on terrorists over the past two years, ayh have come to the see that the system is filled primarily with real people BUT they are words for paychecks not actual journalists.

They system appears to primarily be (and ayh did a neat dive on this last year with several examples) the copy editors have a set narrative as defined by the exec editor --> they sit in conference and talk about leads, direction, focus, etc.. Project Veritas had a great sneak on CNN doing that one time with Zucker giving content direction.

At a central hub, stories are aggregated from local affiliates. These are then distributed by the editor to a rolodex of authors with outlines on what to write. These authors were hired bcz they inherently have a specific inflection that caters to the style of narrative desired.

The editor sends the story the author with specific bullet points and benchmarks. Then says give me xyz words for xyz pay.

These dipshits, primarily in NY, DC and SF then write the piece with little to no actual research, bcz it is already in front of them as provided by the editor, and send it back to the editor who as is their job, and as revealed by several journalists in a story ayh really wanted to link to but can't find right now, the copy editor is as their job is to change the article for publication. The link was to an interview of a journo who says "Ayh have no idea what happens to the article after ayh write it.. they change it several times."

He was responding to an article he "wrote" that the headline was changed three times bcz it was worded in a way that made the cohoax narrative look bad.

So, in long summary.. the people are real but they are draft writers.. they get what they are supposed to write, write it, collect a paycheck. That is why you now see people 3,000 miles away write a story about xyz or someone who is a sports writer write about CDC reporting on CoVID or.. etc.

Anywho --> #BurnTheBridge

Jamezelo 4 points ago +4 / -0

When the veil is lifted and this shit exposed for what it is... we're going to see madness like never before

It's dragging someone out of platos cave and throwing them in a window seat on an airplane

What they thought they knew vs the reality will turn the less stable minds to oatmeal

It'd be like a fish in a bowl suddenly being in the ocean (ignore the fresh/salt water shit issue for that lol)

BloodShallReign 4 points ago +4 / -0

Most of them do it for free. Utter shit birds.

One-Four-Zero 3 points ago +4 / -1

Defend? Nah, nah, nah, nah, nah, nah, you've gotta attack!

You just can't make it in modern cult management if you're not always on the offensive all the time! It doesn't matter why: just launch a campaign. Get boots on the ground, and then put those boots on the necks of anyone who disagrees! Publically tar and feather the acolytes of opposing cults in order to mock and humiliate them. Set fire to the granaries in order to prove to the government men that you mean real business (and that this isn't personal, business is just business). Get a flag designed and plant it absolutely everywhere.

Rembmer: politics is just a form of regulated civil war, and since the regulations haven't been updated in epochs, they still follow the old roman law of warfare: "Arrive Firstus with the Mostus" Outnumbering the other guy is absolutely essential since it makes you more correct (by the modren definition at least), so recruit obsessively. Offer people free shit if you have to. Just have mooks, and dress them all in a uniform so you all look the same.

Lead your mob down to the clubhouse of the nearest rival cult, and do a BIG raid & pillage all over the place. Completely sack the entire joint, taking for yourselves all of their nice things, and applying hammers to the rest such that it is rendered down into woodchips and dust. If they should try to summon security, hurl the thugs bodily away from yourself and keep vandalising.

That is how you succeed with cults; never defend, always attack - and viciously too!

Zap_Powerz [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

I had not looked at this way, but this is surprisingly eye opening and accurate.

KiloRomeo 2 points ago +3 / -1


PaperInk 2 points ago +2 / -0

My friend said she trusted the science. "A few can die to save millions".

Looks like it's the other way bitch.

Soperp 1 point ago +2 / -1

i bet they wish they could admit it was gain of function designed in a lab and that's why it's hard to make a vaccine that works