Agree. theyve always used the j&j as the scape to goat. first with the added tests last summer acting as if there were actually safeguards, then temp banning it, and now claiming its the reason for the mysterious virus. it Could just as easily be a mutation from the other (or all) vaccs that caused a more serious effect in children because they werent able to fight it off like the vacced person or persons who bred that mutation. im leaning towards the 2nd scapegoating of it. i also want to know how many of their families were half or fully vacced.
Agree. theyve always used the j&j as the scape to goat. first with the added tests last summer acting as if there were actually safeguards, then temp banning it, and now claiming its the reason for the mysterious virus. it Could just as easily be a mutation from the other (or all) vaccs that caused a more serious effect in children because they werent able to fight it off like the vacced person or persons who bred that mutation. im leaning towards the 2nd scapegoating of it. i also want to know how many of their families were half or fully vacced.
Guess j&j shouldn't have cheaped out on the bribe