Stonehnege is fake
(www.y2mate.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (23)
sorted by:
Fake and gay. Even if there was a ruined Stone Structure on Sailsbury plain. It looked nothing like it does today. They've been adding more and more and more stones to it. Inserting more and more narratives into it. It never aligned with the Solistices, it was never an ancient calander. It was known for much longer as Roman ruins.
It was inserted, because even Ireland has better Neolithic ruins, but Britain makes monkeys, and it needed to compete with the Frogs. Of who has the best neolithic builders. Let's all call Stonehenge the oldest. Raspberries.
Stonehenge was mentioned in 12th-century writings. You think they faked Stonehenge back then to "make money"?