Life being moved from inception towards death (aka form within flow) represents a response to origin. Those who ignore this are tempted to seek confirmation from others; which in return causes those who exploit ignorance by playing the merchants for temptation.
Also; before judging others for seeking attention; why not question oneself being tempted by suggested confirmation from the very screens we're looking at right now?
a) want vs don't want represents the conflict of reason; caused by consent to a suggestion. I struggle between need (perceived) and want (suggested); which doesn't represent a conflict, but my position as choice at the center of balance (need/want).
b) OPINION, noun [Latin opinio, opinor, to thing.] - "the judgment which the mind forms of any proposition, statement, theory or event". As one thing within every thing; you don't make "things"; you are made into a thing; while responding to everything. Perceivable reality doesn't need to be judged; it's moving everything and you need to adapt to this aka resist (formed life) its velocity (flow from inception towards death) for the sustenance of self.
why do you read forums?
a) I adapt to inspiration to grow my comprehension of perceived, and the pace of perceivable differences on the suggested anonymous internet works for me to grow my comprehension of perceived ignorance. In other words...the web draws its prey; so its stuck within the suggested fiction; which allows me to question ignorance without them running away like in reality.
Ignorance represents the choice of want (suggested) over need (perceived); which implies the shirking of response-ability (choice within balance). Touching the topic of shirked responsibility and submission to the suggested will of others within reality, tempts others to nope right out of and seek shelter in even deeper ignorance or to start insulting the source mentally and physically. No issue judging others; yet dipping their pinkie into self reflection and the mood changes. On the web I can face this; which allows me to reflect upon myself and my own ignorance.
It's a great tool for adaptation to inspiration; because it mimics endless temptation through suggested information; which the parasitic few are harvesting effortlessly.
b) FO'RUM, noun - "a public place, where causes were judicially tried, and orations delivered to the people; also a market place"
The market place refers to choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law; while the judgment aspect refers to the aforementioned opinion issue aka the few domesticating the many to seek confirmation; while ignoring CON (together with) FIRM (form) -ATION (by action) aka being the reaction enacted upon.
Lastly; the orations (uttering) on the web are based on suggested information by corporations (aka corpus oration aka uttering of the dead; which refers to dead legal entities aka life ignoring perceived for suggested). This ties to your name on the birth-certificate aka you ignoring to be (form) out of (flow) for instead consenting to live in nomine (in the name of) an incorporated idol (your name); owned by others; hence systemically oppressed under the suggested laws of men.
a) remembering represents response to memorized information suggested; while ignoring to adapt to inspiration perceived. A mind (memory) filled with suggested information represents the "ego"; which constantly tempts to ignore perceived for uphold suggestions; which is why the parasitic few are filling it up with endless suggested information.
b) HU'MAN, adjective [Latin humanus; Heb. form, species.] + AN'IMAL, noun [Latin animal from anima, air, breath, soul.] represent suggested allegory for perceived animated (animal) form (human) aka form (life) out of flow (inception towards death). We are being tricked to consent to an animal vs human conflict; which tempts to ignore us representing animal (animated) humans (forms).
c) EXEMPT', verb transitive [Latin eximo, exemptus; ex and emo, to take.] It's the choice to ignore the need to adapt to perceived inspiration for the temptation to want to "take" suggested information; which isolates oneself among all others. Instead of expressing oneself; one is tempted to repress oneself.
I have the same ridiculous drive for attention that other people do, albeit is expressed quite differently
a) life is being driven from inception towards death; hence temporarily growing within ongoing loss. We exist within temptation; yet are inspired (perceived inspiration) to resist (form) velocity (flow) for self sustenance.
b) it's the choice to ignore the need to adapt to perceived, which tempts one to want what others suggest. ATTEN (observant; regarding with care) -TION (action) implies being the reaction (form) to action (flow). The many are tempted to attend to the reactions of the suggesting few; while ignoring to react to being enacted upon.
c) each form represents a differentiation out of the same flow. Perceiving moving differences represents communicated inspiration for the sustenance of self through adaptation as choice (form) to balance (flow).
d) most attention seeking represents the want for confirmation; caused by the ignorance of origin aka lack of self discernment of being a temporary ONE out of an ongoing ALL. ALL is being offered to each ONE within; yet those who ignore this are tempted to want confirmation for everything from others. Nature doesn't require confirmation; since it represents the action that forms all reactions. The latter being demanded, hence the need for adaptation.
The parasitic few utilize all suggested words; languages; symbolism etc. to tempt the consenting many to ignore the perceived reality for the suggested fiction; which in return allows the few to a) define; redefine and contradict suggested fiction for all those who ignore perceived reality and b) farm the suicidal who refuse to be resistance within velocity.
Suggestion represents the industrialization of tempting others to ignore adaptation...and it represents each ones free will of choice to resist want (suggestion) for need (perception). I can explain this in detail; yet I can't make that choice for others; hence the communication issue among the many.
You can be a human and still mock our silly mating rituals.
It's the ignorance of choice representing the sole authority over self aka the response-ability within balance; which tempts us to mock the choices of others; instead of utilizing our own. Choice represents unrestricted access to everything perceivable aka "free" will of choice in response to the "dom"inance of balance aka free-dom. Restricting each other through suggestion ignores this. Under the laws of nature: choice has to be unrestricted to be able to function as the center of balance; while under the suggested laws of men; choice is being domesticated with rules of behavior; well rules for thee (many); but not for me (few) that is.
I only use it as a reference to ongoing revisionism; which I then wholesale undermine by questioning the perceived origin (sound); the suggestions (words) were shaped out of; hence IN'TEREST, verb transitive [Latin inter and esse.] aka internal essence (to be); which implies out of; by; within and therefore in response to.
exploring the etymology of each word tends to ignore the colloquial meaning they have acquired
COLLOQUIAL, adjective - "pertaining to common conversation"
a) the origin of perceivable represents common (flow); those within perceiving it represent differentiation (form). The verses one shapes come out of the same sound. Form (life) represents a differentiated ingredient out of the same base flow (inception towards death).
b) the growth of life implies expansion within energy after energy self differentiated aka from flow (loss) into form (growth).
c) ACQUI'RE, verb transitive (Latin acquiro, ad and quaero to seek, that is to follow, to press, to urge; acquiro signifies to pursue to the end or object; Heb. to seek, to make towards, to follow.)...which ignores that life doesn't follow towards the end (death); but is moved; hence representing the temporary resistance (life) within ongoing velocity (inception towards death).
Life isn't outcome oriented; the few suggest progressivism to tempt the many into following orders instead of being the resistance to the natural order. Life represents a response to origin; to being moved.
d) suggested words don't have a meaning (fiction); they tempt to ignore the perceived sound (reality) the words were shaped out of by responding choice. "insane person" represents a suggested meaning; while "in sanus" (within sound) + "per sonos" (by sound) represents perceivable meaning aka being within; by; out of and therefore in response to sound; hence having the choice of resonance (to perceived) or dissonance (to suggested).
The colloquial acquisition of meaning for "insane person" represents domestication to consent to suggested collectivism; which is then being used by the few to wield as an accusation against anyone who stands out from the domesticated many. The many consenting to what the few suggest "insane person" means is what is being utilized to further enslave them; domesticate the will; corrupt their memory; and restrict their comprehension away from the perceivable reality.
This results in a lot of off-topic word salad that doesn't add anything of relevance to the conversation
a) "adding" implies the want for more; while ignoring the need to adapt to "everything" perceivable one already got. One cannot add to reality; one can only express what's already there.
The deception here represents the suggestion of creationism (out of nothing); which ignores transmutation (out of everything); hence flow to form (inception); form within flow (life), and form to flow (death). Try "adding" a new though into reality without shaping it out of already perceivable...creation cannot exist for those perceiving; since they exist within the perceivable.
b) on vs off (another want vs not rebranding) ignores that there's no off within energy...both ongoing (flow) and temporary (form) coexist within energy as the power of velocity (loss) and the power of resistance (growth).
c) TOP'IC, noun [Gr. place; Latin topicus, topica.] - "any subject of discourse or argument" ignores that having the choice to argue implies being subjected to balance (need/want); hence existing at the center of it as the responding choice.
Furthermore; arguing (want vs not want reasoning) represents the ignorance of balance; hence putting oneself within an imbalance (versus conflict among choices). What one is reasoning (want vs not want) about are the suggestions of the few; who use them to divide the many into reasoning among each other.
d) how could I breach the suggested word; consented to by all those reasoning against each other about its meaning; as to describe the perceived origin of every word (sound shaped by choice)?
What are the implications (if/then) of the few suggesting words to deceive the many to reason (want vs not want) about their meaning; while ignoring the need to adapt as choice to perceived sound within balance (resonance/dissonance)? Could it be that those who consent to suggested words; perceive any mentioning of perceived sound as "word salad"?
If this is just a playground for developing your own style of long-winded discourse, then I suppose it doesn't matter.
a) I adapt to perceived inspiration, as to grow my comprehension of perceived; which requires my free will of choice to resist want (suggested information) for need (perceived inspiration). What others do with this represents their free will of choice.
b) adaptation to inspiration represents the growth of resistance (form) within velocity (flow); hence sustaining "matter" within immaterial.
c) what you view as long winded represents an expression of limited form tapping into infinite flow for inspiration. I do this all on the fly; every response unique; drawing connections between as many things as possible; while letting my consciousness roam free. If others adapt to any of this; then I can refocus on that; other than that I'm done with adaptation the moment I click save. I don't write this for others; but for the sustenance of self; which grows my ecosystem; which in return benefits all those around me.
feedback
There's only one source for food (flow to form); and form vs form (agreement vs disagreement) only leads to starvation; since both are ignoring the only infinite source of food. Look around you and ask yourself how the few can set up world wide famines without the mass ignorance of the many? Reasoning doesn't represent feedback; but wasting each others lunch; while the parasitic few accumulate the world wide food supplies away from the many. Maybe instead of wanting feedback; you should consider exchanging "feetback"...a kick in the ass every once in a while could inspire self sustenance.
I suggest you try a different approach
a) suggestion (want or not want) ignores perception (need)
b) as form within flow everything perceivable represents a difference; yet the suggestions of others tempt one to ignore it for sameness.
c) APPROACH, verb - "to drive, move, or press toward"...that represents the want for outcome (towards death); while ignoring adaptation to origin (for the sustenance of life). I'm busy within momentum; so the suggestion to approach death doesn't tempt me right now.
the majority of people skipping past your comments as soon as they see your username
"free-will-of-choice detected...everyone...deploy ignorance!" Hilarious; yet the consequences of individual ignorance are collectively shared in a balance based system.
Life being moved from inception towards death (aka form within flow) represents a response to origin. Those who ignore this are tempted to seek confirmation from others; which in return causes those who exploit ignorance by playing the merchants for temptation.
Also; before judging others for seeking attention; why not question oneself being tempted by suggested confirmation from the very screens we're looking at right now?
If you don't want opinions... Why are you reading forums?
a) want vs don't want represents the conflict of reason; caused by consent to a suggestion. I struggle between need (perceived) and want (suggested); which doesn't represent a conflict, but my position as choice at the center of balance (need/want).
b) OPINION, noun [Latin opinio, opinor, to thing.] - "the judgment which the mind forms of any proposition, statement, theory or event". As one thing within every thing; you don't make "things"; you are made into a thing; while responding to everything. Perceivable reality doesn't need to be judged; it's moving everything and you need to adapt to this aka resist (formed life) its velocity (flow from inception towards death) for the sustenance of self.
a) I adapt to inspiration to grow my comprehension of perceived, and the pace of perceivable differences on the suggested anonymous internet works for me to grow my comprehension of perceived ignorance. In other words...the web draws its prey; so its stuck within the suggested fiction; which allows me to question ignorance without them running away like in reality.
Ignorance represents the choice of want (suggested) over need (perceived); which implies the shirking of response-ability (choice within balance). Touching the topic of shirked responsibility and submission to the suggested will of others within reality, tempts others to nope right out of and seek shelter in even deeper ignorance or to start insulting the source mentally and physically. No issue judging others; yet dipping their pinkie into self reflection and the mood changes. On the web I can face this; which allows me to reflect upon myself and my own ignorance.
It's a great tool for adaptation to inspiration; because it mimics endless temptation through suggested information; which the parasitic few are harvesting effortlessly.
b) FO'RUM, noun - "a public place, where causes were judicially tried, and orations delivered to the people; also a market place"
The market place refers to choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law; while the judgment aspect refers to the aforementioned opinion issue aka the few domesticating the many to seek confirmation; while ignoring CON (together with) FIRM (form) -ATION (by action) aka being the reaction enacted upon.
Lastly; the orations (uttering) on the web are based on suggested information by corporations (aka corpus oration aka uttering of the dead; which refers to dead legal entities aka life ignoring perceived for suggested). This ties to your name on the birth-certificate aka you ignoring to be (form) out of (flow) for instead consenting to live in nomine (in the name of) an incorporated idol (your name); owned by others; hence systemically oppressed under the suggested laws of men.
a) remembering represents response to memorized information suggested; while ignoring to adapt to inspiration perceived. A mind (memory) filled with suggested information represents the "ego"; which constantly tempts to ignore perceived for uphold suggestions; which is why the parasitic few are filling it up with endless suggested information.
b) HU'MAN, adjective [Latin humanus; Heb. form, species.] + AN'IMAL, noun [Latin animal from anima, air, breath, soul.] represent suggested allegory for perceived animated (animal) form (human) aka form (life) out of flow (inception towards death). We are being tricked to consent to an animal vs human conflict; which tempts to ignore us representing animal (animated) humans (forms).
c) EXEMPT', verb transitive [Latin eximo, exemptus; ex and emo, to take.] It's the choice to ignore the need to adapt to perceived inspiration for the temptation to want to "take" suggested information; which isolates oneself among all others. Instead of expressing oneself; one is tempted to repress oneself.
a) life is being driven from inception towards death; hence temporarily growing within ongoing loss. We exist within temptation; yet are inspired (perceived inspiration) to resist (form) velocity (flow) for self sustenance.
b) it's the choice to ignore the need to adapt to perceived, which tempts one to want what others suggest. ATTEN (observant; regarding with care) -TION (action) implies being the reaction (form) to action (flow). The many are tempted to attend to the reactions of the suggesting few; while ignoring to react to being enacted upon.
c) each form represents a differentiation out of the same flow. Perceiving moving differences represents communicated inspiration for the sustenance of self through adaptation as choice (form) to balance (flow).
d) most attention seeking represents the want for confirmation; caused by the ignorance of origin aka lack of self discernment of being a temporary ONE out of an ongoing ALL. ALL is being offered to each ONE within; yet those who ignore this are tempted to want confirmation for everything from others. Nature doesn't require confirmation; since it represents the action that forms all reactions. The latter being demanded, hence the need for adaptation.
The parasitic few utilize all suggested words; languages; symbolism etc. to tempt the consenting many to ignore the perceived reality for the suggested fiction; which in return allows the few to a) define; redefine and contradict suggested fiction for all those who ignore perceived reality and b) farm the suicidal who refuse to be resistance within velocity.
Suggestion represents the industrialization of tempting others to ignore adaptation...and it represents each ones free will of choice to resist want (suggestion) for need (perception). I can explain this in detail; yet I can't make that choice for others; hence the communication issue among the many.
It's the ignorance of choice representing the sole authority over self aka the response-ability within balance; which tempts us to mock the choices of others; instead of utilizing our own. Choice represents unrestricted access to everything perceivable aka "free" will of choice in response to the "dom"inance of balance aka free-dom. Restricting each other through suggestion ignores this. Under the laws of nature: choice has to be unrestricted to be able to function as the center of balance; while under the suggested laws of men; choice is being domesticated with rules of behavior; well rules for thee (many); but not for me (few) that is.
I only use it as a reference to ongoing revisionism; which I then wholesale undermine by questioning the perceived origin (sound); the suggestions (words) were shaped out of; hence IN'TEREST, verb transitive [Latin inter and esse.] aka internal essence (to be); which implies out of; by; within and therefore in response to.
a) the origin of perceivable represents common (flow); those within perceiving it represent differentiation (form). The verses one shapes come out of the same sound. Form (life) represents a differentiated ingredient out of the same base flow (inception towards death).
b) the growth of life implies expansion within energy after energy self differentiated aka from flow (loss) into form (growth).
c) ACQUI'RE, verb transitive (Latin acquiro, ad and quaero to seek, that is to follow, to press, to urge; acquiro signifies to pursue to the end or object; Heb. to seek, to make towards, to follow.)...which ignores that life doesn't follow towards the end (death); but is moved; hence representing the temporary resistance (life) within ongoing velocity (inception towards death).
Life isn't outcome oriented; the few suggest progressivism to tempt the many into following orders instead of being the resistance to the natural order. Life represents a response to origin; to being moved.
d) suggested words don't have a meaning (fiction); they tempt to ignore the perceived sound (reality) the words were shaped out of by responding choice. "insane person" represents a suggested meaning; while "in sanus" (within sound) + "per sonos" (by sound) represents perceivable meaning aka being within; by; out of and therefore in response to sound; hence having the choice of resonance (to perceived) or dissonance (to suggested).
The colloquial acquisition of meaning for "insane person" represents domestication to consent to suggested collectivism; which is then being used by the few to wield as an accusation against anyone who stands out from the domesticated many. The many consenting to what the few suggest "insane person" means is what is being utilized to further enslave them; domesticate the will; corrupt their memory; and restrict their comprehension away from the perceivable reality.
a) "adding" implies the want for more; while ignoring the need to adapt to "everything" perceivable one already got. One cannot add to reality; one can only express what's already there.
The deception here represents the suggestion of creationism (out of nothing); which ignores transmutation (out of everything); hence flow to form (inception); form within flow (life), and form to flow (death). Try "adding" a new though into reality without shaping it out of already perceivable...creation cannot exist for those perceiving; since they exist within the perceivable.
b) on vs off (another want vs not rebranding) ignores that there's no off within energy...both ongoing (flow) and temporary (form) coexist within energy as the power of velocity (loss) and the power of resistance (growth).
c) TOP'IC, noun [Gr. place; Latin topicus, topica.] - "any subject of discourse or argument" ignores that having the choice to argue implies being subjected to balance (need/want); hence existing at the center of it as the responding choice.
Furthermore; arguing (want vs not want reasoning) represents the ignorance of balance; hence putting oneself within an imbalance (versus conflict among choices). What one is reasoning (want vs not want) about are the suggestions of the few; who use them to divide the many into reasoning among each other.
d) how could I breach the suggested word; consented to by all those reasoning against each other about its meaning; as to describe the perceived origin of every word (sound shaped by choice)?
What are the implications (if/then) of the few suggesting words to deceive the many to reason (want vs not want) about their meaning; while ignoring the need to adapt as choice to perceived sound within balance (resonance/dissonance)? Could it be that those who consent to suggested words; perceive any mentioning of perceived sound as "word salad"?
a) I adapt to perceived inspiration, as to grow my comprehension of perceived; which requires my free will of choice to resist want (suggested information) for need (perceived inspiration). What others do with this represents their free will of choice.
b) adaptation to inspiration represents the growth of resistance (form) within velocity (flow); hence sustaining "matter" within immaterial.
c) what you view as long winded represents an expression of limited form tapping into infinite flow for inspiration. I do this all on the fly; every response unique; drawing connections between as many things as possible; while letting my consciousness roam free. If others adapt to any of this; then I can refocus on that; other than that I'm done with adaptation the moment I click save. I don't write this for others; but for the sustenance of self; which grows my ecosystem; which in return benefits all those around me.
There's only one source for food (flow to form); and form vs form (agreement vs disagreement) only leads to starvation; since both are ignoring the only infinite source of food. Look around you and ask yourself how the few can set up world wide famines without the mass ignorance of the many? Reasoning doesn't represent feedback; but wasting each others lunch; while the parasitic few accumulate the world wide food supplies away from the many. Maybe instead of wanting feedback; you should consider exchanging "feetback"...a kick in the ass every once in a while could inspire self sustenance.
a) suggestion (want or not want) ignores perception (need)
b) as form within flow everything perceivable represents a difference; yet the suggestions of others tempt one to ignore it for sameness.
c) APPROACH, verb - "to drive, move, or press toward"...that represents the want for outcome (towards death); while ignoring adaptation to origin (for the sustenance of life). I'm busy within momentum; so the suggestion to approach death doesn't tempt me right now.
"free-will-of-choice detected...everyone...deploy ignorance!" Hilarious; yet the consequences of individual ignorance are collectively shared in a balance based system.