Russia at this point are undoubtedly considering it. It should worry you.
Let's coinflip the odds. Significant. Increasing as this conflict escalates. How would you make an enemy yield and proceed to win a truce. An enemy refusing terms because it is being armed. In a localised conflict. There's no guarantee Nato will respond to a tactical nuke in Ukraine. Any supposed endgame being offered is the full withdrawal of Russian troops. No territory granted. It means there will be no treaty, until the other side breaks. Except Russia has nukes. Ukraine has also got nuclear fallout in it already.
The odds are significant. There is only Russia holding Russia back. Because it could lose other partners. Perhaps China, India. It could lose what it wants. It doesn't want to lose its people. How would it look in any territory supporting it?
But if this continues at this press pace. Defeating Russia. What are those odds?
No I am not Russian, but I have more common sense than this shit.
There is however another element. It plays a much larger role. These people are being sacrificed. Like the dish of the day to drive those cunts and likewise in this press profit. Look how they lie because they can. It cares only about it. Where Russia are another tool. All those Generals screaming deploy. But is there another strategy. It has already been sliced served and feasted on. Although if wrong. There's gonna be hell to pay. This doesn't end well and not like this.
Consider it. That risk is increasing. It's only held back by a thinner veil. What is it? Image, and winning what. The stake being offered is none. The longer it rides the greater the escalation. It is serving an agenda. We're all paying for it. It's driving the next era of tech. Are they complict if they caused it. Certainly there is only risk?
Russia at this point are undoubtedly considering it. It should worry you.
Let's coinflip the odds. Significant. Increasing as this conflict escalates. How would you make an enemy yield and proceed to win a truce. An enemy refusing terms because it is being armed. In a localised conflict. There's no guarantee Nato will respond to a tactical nuke in Ukraine. Any supposed endgame being offered is the full withdrawal of Russian troops. No territory granted. It means there will be no treaty, until the other side breaks. Except Russia has nukes. Ukraine has also got nuclear fallout in it already.
The odds are significant. There is only Russia holding Russia back. Because it could lose other partners. Perhaps China, India. It could lose what it wants. It doesn't want to lose its people. How would it look in any territory supporting it?
But if this continues at this press pace. Defeating Russia. What are those odds?
No I am not Russian, but I have more common sense than this shit.
There is however another element. It plays a much larger role. These people are being sacrificed. Like the dish of the day to drive those cunts and likewise in this press profit. Look how they lie because they can. It cares only about it. Where Russia are another tool. All those Generals screaming deploy. But is there another strategy. It has already been sliced served and feasted on. Although if wrong. There's gonna be hell to pay. This doesn't end well and not like this.
Consider it. That risk is increasing. It's only held back by a thinner veil. What is it? Image, and winning what. The stake being offered is none. The longer it rides the greater the escalation. It is serving an agenda. We're all paying for it. It's driving the next era of tech. Are they complict if they caused it. Certainly there is only risk?