20 Proofs NASA Faked the Moon Landings
(www.bitchute.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (17)
sorted by:
I was about to check out when he started with the moon isn’t a physical object. Glad i stayed, fantastic slaying of the claim of a moon landing.
The moon isn't a physical object, it's a semi transparent luminary.
I suspect this is correct. It may even be a reflection/"hologram" drawn in ionized plasma in the rarefied air (the reason for its monochromatic palette)
I think I've already invited you - but just the same - please join us on the community I created to discuss, explore, and share our views on this subject!
Click my username to find the link, or let me know and I will PM it to you!
Ok, I can take this is a logical argument, and can build on how the ratio of the moon's size to the distance of the sun.
Just calling it a transparent luminary which is a phrase from ancient astrology isn't very convincing though.