Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

13
()
posted 3 years ago by pkvi 3 years ago by pkvi +16 / -3
17 comments share
17 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (17)
sorted by:
▲ 0 ▼
– AugustusSeraphim 0 points 3 years ago +1 / -1

I'm questioning why russia is using its newest and most advanced weapons in syria but in ukraine is using old equitment. I can't help but think this is all theater. No matter what happens ukraine will never be "whole" again.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– forinfren 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Well, most of it is theater. For the particular aspect you noted - both Russia and Ukraine's "allies" in the EU and NATO are dumping their obsolete equipment in the country - the latest example being a 40+ year old missile cruiser in an age when submarines can do the same job, but safer and more covertly.

Basically, it works like this: The Russians line up a column of Z-marked tanks (the Z basically stands for "scrapped"), the crews get out when the cameras aren't running, a bunch of man-portable missiles are fired at the machines and an artillery or airstrike blasts them to pieces, finishing the job. Meanwhile, the "slava Ukraini" idiots cheer on social media looking at the footage... and both sides are spared the expense of storing or recycling this type of volatile and still dangerous equipment, and are now free to procure next-gen gear from the manufacturers.

Overall, it's not a bad way for countries to refresh their arsenals, and it sure beats using an actual war to do it.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Skyrison 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

they aren't really using a quarter of their potential or a lot of their "new stuff". all they did with their new stuff was use 2 or 3 hypersonic missiles to destroy some depots. but they are barely using a lot of their other newer stuff.

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - lf7fw (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy