twitter board members
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (28)
sorted by:
BRAH...
ELON SWINGING HIS DICK W/ 10% OWNERSHIP.
AND THESE BLUE-HAIRED CUCKLORDS THINK THEY GONNA SWAY TWITTERS FUTURE?
ya seen the ownership %?
fiduciary my ass.
Fiduciary duties are not made obsolete just because a potential acquirer has a large ownership percentage, or that the board does not. Frankly, it is actually pretty uncommon for directors themselves to have large equity holdings. Typically, the directors are appointed by shareholders that have large equity holdings, knowing that the respective shareholder can vote them out if the director starts acting against their interest.
elon = take'n more than 1 company into unicorn territory
twitter board = professional circle jerkers. they also help each other to dye any roots coming in.
elon = owns more twitter X 5 than any on the board
the board-cucks have NO ROOM to think theyre the smartest in the room.
I think you fundamentally misunderstand what a fiduciary duty is. It is to the shareholders, not between board members.
I am honestly kind of confused what you're taking issue with. That Elon is not on the board? You realize that was his decision right?
yah, elon didnt want on the board. fo'sure.
why? cause board "rules" state anyone on the board cannot own more than 14.9% shares of twatter.
of course he denied them blue-hairs. smart move.
FUIDUCIARY = MAKE MY FCUKN SOME MONEY, HONEY. FUCK YOUR POLITICS. ... AND APPARENTLY, THE RICHEST PERSON IN THE WORLD, WHO HAS TAKEN MULTIPLE COMPANIES TO THE PINNACLE OF THEIR RESPECTIVE INDUSTRIES, WANTS TO BUY THE COMPANY.
YAH... LET THE FUCK BUY THE COMPANY.
and stop listening to Patrick. y'all shoulda done something when he started showing up the board meeting in full chainmail. fuckn larper.