twitter board members
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (28)
sorted by:
A poison pill is in line with their fiduciary duty. This is well entrenched in corporate law.
BRAH...
ELON SWINGING HIS DICK W/ 10% OWNERSHIP.
AND THESE BLUE-HAIRED CUCKLORDS THINK THEY GONNA SWAY TWITTERS FUTURE?
ya seen the ownership %?
fiduciary my ass.
Fiduciary duties are not made obsolete just because a potential acquirer has a large ownership percentage, or that the board does not. Frankly, it is actually pretty uncommon for directors themselves to have large equity holdings. Typically, the directors are appointed by shareholders that have large equity holdings, knowing that the respective shareholder can vote them out if the director starts acting against their interest.
elon = take'n more than 1 company into unicorn territory
twitter board = professional circle jerkers. they also help each other to dye any roots coming in.
elon = owns more twitter X 5 than any on the board
the board-cucks have NO ROOM to think theyre the smartest in the room.
I think you fundamentally misunderstand what a fiduciary duty is. It is to the shareholders, not between board members.
I am honestly kind of confused what you're taking issue with. That Elon is not on the board? You realize that was his decision right?
these board-cucks soooooo want elon to join the board so their fuckery can execute.
imma call it. even w/ 10% elon ownership, the board-cucks gonna figure out how to sap his power.
again, fiduciary my fuckn ass.