Declaration of Personal Independence.
From Orpheus of Greece, disseminated by the Argonauts and witnessed by many:
I am human and consist of mind and body. As a human being, I have inviolable, divine rights. The source of this right, which I also call natural right, is God. It doesn't matter if and what religion I have. Only one thing should be said: In the beginning there is the idea and not the matter. As a human being, I have the right to own my own body. This right includes the following:
No one may intentionally damage my body. This right applies regardless of my age or gender. It applies regardless of which country I come from or where and how I live. The right to ownership of my body applies at all times and cannot be revoked. When my parents, my family, my neighbors, scientists, teachers, bosses, large organizations like the WHO (World Health Organization) or foundations like that of Bill and Melinda Gates, the Pope, kings, politicians, so-called experts or even all people who claim , they are authorized to harm my body against my will, then they violate my divine right and are guilty.
If a state, parliament or government enacts laws that restrict the right to my body, they are acting against natural law. I have the right to rebel against this and I have the right to rise up against this tyranny.
The right to my body includes the right to my own health. I decide for myself what I put into my body. This applies to food but also to everything else, be it tattoos, hairstyle or clothing. Even if I put wrong or harmful substances into my body, I alone, as the owner of my body, am authorized to make decisions regarding my health. However, I hope to keep an open mind, get inspired, and just keep learning to make the choices that are for the good of my body and mind.
The right to my body prohibits anyone from vaccinating me without my express consent. A vaccination contradicts my right to my body and can, with no exception and with no justification, cancel the natural right to which I am entitled as a human being. The refusal of a vaccination must not be linked to any disadvantages or the restriction of my other rights. Whoever does that is guilty. The right to my body also includes freedom of movement and assembly. I can move my body wherever I want at any time. I do not have to accept restrictions on this right, even if I am told that I am endangering the health of others. Only when I am obviously ill and my fellow human beings, i.e. my brothers and sisters, smell, hear or see the illness or I have a high fever and it is obvious that I am ill, then do I accept a proportionate restriction of my freedom of movement and freedom of assembly until I no longer show symptoms. But if I don't show any clinical symptoms, any restrictions on my freedom of movement and assembly violate natural law.
Freedom of movement also includes freedom to visit and travel. When governments and states draw borders and don't let me leave or enter, they restrict my freedom of movement and therefore my right to move my body where I want.
I am aware that not everyone likes this point or is even against open borders, but isn't it the case that we always limit ourselves with borders? If, instead of a homeland, every human being had property in homeland, i.e. enough land to feed him and his family or friends if managed sensibly, how many national borders would it then still need? A mask requirement for a healthy person contradicts the right to my body.
I can also use my body for work. Banning me from working when I'm healthy, i.e. putting me under lockdown, is void because it violates my right to my body. Because my spirit lives in my body, my declaration applies to my spirit. There is more to say, but it is beyond the scope of this declaration.
I'm not afraid of viruses because I know that a good immune system protects me. And even if I didn't have a good immune system, that doesn't mean I want to restrict the rights of healthy people. I demand the following from all rulers of this earth:
- A ban on lockdowns for the healthy.
- A ban on lockdowns for industries.
- A ban on restricting the rights of healthy people.
- A ban on compulsory vaccinations.
Pax, Veritas, Felicitas Orpheus
That implies in dependence to being by sound (Latin per sonos); hence in response to it.
a) HU'MAN, adjective [Latin humanus; Heb. form.] implies formed out of flow; hence being form (life) within flow (inception towards death).
b) CONSIST, verb intransitive - "to be in a fixed or permanent state". Form within flow represents a temporary within an ongoing state/condition.
a) RIGHT, adjective. [Latin rectus; rego; reg-] - "move in a straight line" aka life being moved from inception towards death. Form doesn't have rights; it temporarily exist within the natural order of flow aka form responses to being moved in a straight line (rights).
b) divine (foreknown aka before knowledge aka before perception) represents flow before form aka perceivable before perceiving.
c) inviolable (within violent) represents being temporary growth (form) within ongoing loss (flow) aka temporary chaos within ongoing order; hence the struggle to survive.
a) the word "God" is suggested; the perceived sound is being ignored when consenting to the suggested word. Faith represent choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law; which ignores balance (offer) to choice (response) natural law.
b) NATURE, noun - "born, produced" implies into and out of; hence not a source but a response to it. The source of nature represents EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power". Work precedes production.
RELIGION, noun (Latin religio) - " to bind anew; re (response) and ligo (to bind)". Once again representing choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law; in ignorance of balance (offer) to choice (response) natural law.
IDE'A, noun [Latin idea; Gr. to see]. Perception by senses implies as matter (form) within immaterial (flow). In the beginning was the ONEness (energy) of ALL (flow/form) aka the external ALL for each internal ONE response.
Flow to form (inception); form within flow (life), and form to flow (death) represents forms transmutation out of base flow. Ownership implies the vessel (formed ship) within flow; hence belonging (owned) to flow.
Life being moved from inception towards death; hence processed within the momentum of motion; cannot own anything; only utilize everything for self sustenance or ignore it. Claiming to own doesn't represent owning; just ignorance towards being temporary within ongoing.
Every one has the free will of choice to respond regardless of everyone else.
Guilty (of crime) implies your consent to the suggested laws of men; while ignoring the perceived consequences of natural law. There's no such thing as crime within natural law; only response to being processed within balance (momentum) as the responding free will of choice. The choice to ignore balance; while causing imbalance within momentum represents the sole responsibility of each choice; because the consequences of each choice are shared among everyone.
a) consenting to a suggested state; parliament or government ignores perceived consequences of natural law.
b) those within natural law cannot enact natural law; since they represent the "reaction" to it.
c) natural law (flow to form) implies those within to exist within a momentum (balance); not within an imbalance (versus; conflict; against). Those who ignore perceived balance (need/want) for suggested imbalance (want vs not want) are being deceived into the conflict of reason.
The parasitic few use suggestion (-isms) to cause division (reason) among the many; which a) allows the few to control both sides of every conflict and b) allows the few to define; redefine and contradict at will what the many are reasoning about.
Against others implies in ignorance of being for the sustenance of self.
CONSENT, noun - "agreement of the mind to what is proposed or state by another". Agreement implies versus disagreement; hence want vs not want conflict of reason; caused by consenting to a suggestion by others.
Choice does not need to consent to suggested choices; choice represents the response-ability within balance; hence being "free" will of choice within the "dom"inance of balance (free-dom). Choice is tempted to ignore needed response to balance for suggested choices by others, and resisting that represents the struggle of self sustenance aka need over want instead of want over need.