No. Unlikely. It triggers an outcry. Perhaps they confined citizens and used them as shields. They didn't surrender. In fact the fighting there has been brutal, losses both sides. But as soldiers they'd know the calvary isn't coming. Holding out for as long as possible. Likely they simply held out within that population. Painting symbols and hoping to hide. There was likely foreign contingents among them.
To be honest it doesn't matter, what are the alternatives.
Was it a warcrime. Not something that can even be tried, currently, or at all, but can only be condemned.
Did they do it. Not probable, but not unlikely. It does call for further support, but it would regardless without it. So no. And not the rationality offered. The calvary aren't charging in, not yet in any event. Did they suicide. Not like that, the Valkyries aren't coming.
It was a theatre. A base. It also had underground facilities.
A couple years ago Israel was still prosecuting Nazi's where evaded trial since WWII. I believe they were residing in the USA. Some of these people were prison guards.
And they were charged with War Crimes. What Azov is doing is far worse. How is this not considered War Crimes?
What is a war-crime? Modern far-right are not. Perhaps extremists. I am not getting into history and conspiracy. I am playing Devil's advocate. Neutral. I dont take sides. Until a hot war occurs then my nation is my side. Perhaps they've committed warcrimes in Donbass on any separatists. But to try warcrimes requires warcriminals to stand trial. It takes a war. Or a coup. Etc.
Would they false flag that population there? Not probable. Why, because any support, the calvary, isn't coming. It's suicide, not completely in their code. Any reaction outcry is the same, perhaps more or less, but the same. No Valkyries by suicide. Even they have some ethics. They hold out defending as soldiers to the last man. They've been using that city and population already, as a base of operations. Digging tunnels, fortifying, etc. The theatre was marked and more likely assumed it meant they could move in an out because it had other population in it.
I don't know, but I am running the odds. They don't favour the false flag there. Try it. Above.
We can debate existing strikes, and again the odds aren't in a favour of false flags. This is war. False flags start wars. They take attacks on the other sides supporting war or observing it. Not an existing war drawn into certain, uncertain preconditions.
No. Unlikely. It triggers an outcry. Perhaps they confined citizens and used them as shields. They didn't surrender. In fact the fighting there has been brutal, losses both sides. But as soldiers they'd know the calvary isn't coming. Holding out for as long as possible. Likely they simply held out within that population. Painting symbols and hoping to hide. There was likely foreign contingents among them.
To be honest it doesn't matter, what are the alternatives.
Was it a warcrime. Not something that can even be tried, currently, or at all, but can only be condemned.
Did they do it. Not probable, but not unlikely. It does call for further support, but it would regardless without it. So no. And not the rationality offered. The calvary aren't charging in, not yet in any event. Did they suicide. Not like that, the Valkyries aren't coming.
It was a theatre. A base. It also had underground facilities.
A couple years ago Israel was still prosecuting Nazi's where evaded trial since WWII. I believe they were residing in the USA. Some of these people were prison guards.
And they were charged with War Crimes. What Azov is doing is far worse. How is this not considered War Crimes?
On some bullshit "evidence " too
What is a war-crime? Modern far-right are not. Perhaps extremists. I am not getting into history and conspiracy. I am playing Devil's advocate. Neutral. I dont take sides. Until a hot war occurs then my nation is my side. Perhaps they've committed warcrimes in Donbass on any separatists. But to try warcrimes requires warcriminals to stand trial. It takes a war. Or a coup. Etc.
Would they false flag that population there? Not probable. Why, because any support, the calvary, isn't coming. It's suicide, not completely in their code. Any reaction outcry is the same, perhaps more or less, but the same. No Valkyries by suicide. Even they have some ethics. They hold out defending as soldiers to the last man. They've been using that city and population already, as a base of operations. Digging tunnels, fortifying, etc. The theatre was marked and more likely assumed it meant they could move in an out because it had other population in it.
I don't know, but I am running the odds. They don't favour the false flag there. Try it. Above.
We can debate existing strikes, and again the odds aren't in a favour of false flags. This is war. False flags start wars. They take attacks on the other sides supporting war or observing it. Not an existing war drawn into certain, uncertain preconditions.