I don't agree with banning ay outlet. Even CNN. But can't say I really care. This is funny.
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (37)
sorted by:
No.no they are not.
A lot of posts I think highly of are schizo posts. It's okay to disagree. I've seen deep truths in their posts however.
Does perceived reality requires the consensus of those within to be perceivable? If consent implies by choice; then doesn't choice imply in response to (balance)?
Understanding represents standing under the suggested information by others. Meanwhile; perceived inspiration doesn't need to be understood; it needs to be comprehended (compressed out of perceived source).
A Mason trying to tell people how it is?
Say it ain't so.
What if life (form) represents the temporary chaos within the natural order of ongoing flow (inception towards death)? Notice the required struggle to stay alive; while resisting the natural order...