It's like I said. The Network studios CGI stuff. It does this because it has to filter out bodies. Demoralising. Unethical. Because it makes propaganda and it uses narratives to rally and control and propagate. It often isn't even on the ground there. Just blue screens, sometimes using actors. There is also jammers and cyber warfare, no coverage, no internet. So journalism is caught between sides. Freelancers uplinking are sometimes army cams further filtered.

Yea studios make up stuff all the time.

Calling it a fake war. No it's far too big. Yes agendas on both sides and others profiting. Nothing changes. While policy put us here now.

Look at the Defcon site. It is level 2. Historically this is real. Because Russian heightened their response. Here's a money guess at Europe possibly sending fighter planes and drones and more lethal aid and supporting mercs. While literally sanctioning hard super hard. It is edgy.

But there is conflict despite the vague coverage.

For the sheer sake of conspiracy and yes I agree on the coverage being skewed. You're suggesting a moon landing. On such a global scale it's fooling far more than the dumb public. And a stupid space narrative. Yes it seemingly ties into agendas, like technology. But a lot of people will get hurt outside of any supposed conflict. Because that fuckery will spread to the markets where all of a sudden shortages are gonna cause fallout. Perhaps part of the plan. But the containment you've assumed will be another dumb narrative when control looses its grip and conflict and protest become real elsewhere spreading. Can you imagine places like Libya increasing in other nations as a result? Food shortages or simply prices hiking or market collapse. It spreads. Unless you're in on it. It gets ugly very ugly. Uncontained.

Okay so there might as well have been conflict justifying any result. Not just CGI propagating support.