If you were to build a system of control, it must be redundant. In this case the CABAL must have ppl that seem opposed to the Cabal, just in case of that low probability scenario in which ppl really wake up due to some not expected catalizator.
Agree. That is most probable reason of appearance of some politicians who suddenly began to proclaim something counter-narrative and try to pose as leaders or frontmens of that counter-narrative. If they are natural, where they were earlier, and why they was completely unknown in conspiracy theorist community as long-time participants?
As I see that process, when any natural people activity, protest, or initiative rises to the levels when it began to somehow interfere with TPTB plans, TPTB insist on "somebody who will speak for others". They push the people to create one, or push some of their puppets for that role. As soon, as such person appear, the game is now going by their rules - all that "politics" shit. This is an awful mistake to agree with that game. This is how they obtain a control over people and their activity TPTB want to control. That is very often become the worst mistake of people - to follow into that trap. Times changed, today you don't need any "representative" or "leader" of any kind at all. Your opponent always perfectly know what you want and how to do it. As soon as you choose somebody as representative, this person will be used against you. And, all in all, there is really nothing to talk about with TPTB. Any non-TPTB induced initiative that rised among people inevitably unwind to the TPTB extermination. You don't need to select "representative" when you fight with cockroaches or any other parasites.
Never a threat. She's far to lefty to be right. It's the undertone that is devisive, it parrots foreign backing. It could be genuine but when it repeats opposing propaganda and It is mostly against American foreign policy. No wonder.
The clever ones are far more devisive with their woke cancel culture.
But tweets like that now and in the past. No favours.
People keep saying this. but you don't get kicked out of the DNC for going along with the plan.
Look, sometimes you need to get your hands dirty if you want to figure out where the bodies are buried.
If you were to build a system of control, it must be redundant. In this case the CABAL must have ppl that seem opposed to the Cabal, just in case of that low probability scenario in which ppl really wake up due to some not expected catalizator.
Agree. That is most probable reason of appearance of some politicians who suddenly began to proclaim something counter-narrative and try to pose as leaders or frontmens of that counter-narrative. If they are natural, where they were earlier, and why they was completely unknown in conspiracy theorist community as long-time participants?
As I see that process, when any natural people activity, protest, or initiative rises to the levels when it began to somehow interfere with TPTB plans, TPTB insist on "somebody who will speak for others". They push the people to create one, or push some of their puppets for that role. As soon, as such person appear, the game is now going by their rules - all that "politics" shit. This is an awful mistake to agree with that game. This is how they obtain a control over people and their activity TPTB want to control. That is very often become the worst mistake of people - to follow into that trap. Times changed, today you don't need any "representative" or "leader" of any kind at all. Your opponent always perfectly know what you want and how to do it. As soon as you choose somebody as representative, this person will be used against you. And, all in all, there is really nothing to talk about with TPTB. Any non-TPTB induced initiative that rised among people inevitably unwind to the TPTB extermination. You don't need to select "representative" when you fight with cockroaches or any other parasites.
Never a threat. She's far to lefty to be right. It's the undertone that is devisive, it parrots foreign backing. It could be genuine but when it repeats opposing propaganda and It is mostly against American foreign policy. No wonder.
The clever ones are far more devisive with their woke cancel culture.
But tweets like that now and in the past. No favours.
But if you have a thousand 'near threats', you die by a thousand cuts.
She's not kicked out of the club. They are using her to normalize to cuckservatives.
I'm sorry. I don't speak phonetard.
https://www.newsmax.com/politics/tulsi-gabbard-hawaii-lieutenant-colonel/2021/10/11/id/1039995/
You certainly seem to
No I don't. Now that you are here, please feel free to define this word for me:
And then proceed to use punctuation and full sentences, while presuming to speak on behalf of others.