Comments (6)
sorted by:
Ep0ch 7 points ago +7 / -0

I don't know how anybody can agree with this? It is unconstitutional. Against the bill of rights.

pkvi [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hilarious you can with a straight face argue that anyone in this era perpetuates founding dogmas. We are well past constitution as a guidestone. While ayh will fight for freedom and to be left alone, the hanging on to dated dogmas is a huge reason why we fail. We have to "interpret" as argument. Just fucking rewrite it to be inescapable.

Ep0ch 2 points ago +2 / -0

What am I supposed to say? I hope justice prevails. We are past that. In the fact such a notion was even entertained and submitted. But when there is such a constitution, so remains the hope, it is or was that dying light.

But the only hope that remains is this future should be stopped before it even begins. Only then can humanity create something else. But they won't before it's too late for them.

SuicideTruthbomber 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is like Bill Clinton's Clipper Chip and V-Chip.

Clipper chip https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clipper_chip

V-chip https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V-chip

factdigger 2 points ago +2 / -0

All according to the plan:

  • herd people into big cities
  • kill the suburbs
  • make living in the countryside/outback/forest impossible
  • make every city 5G-AI-biotech-control-camera-ghetto
  • inject everybody from birth
  • install social credit system
  • take away any/all rights with a flip of a bit