Russia is way stronger than anyone US has ever fought- including russia in WW2. This is foolish. Most likely would be proxy conflict such as in Syria which would take heat off Ukraine
It wouldn't look anything like a war. The NATO / RU matchup is ludicrous. NATO has zero chance of stopping RU. Its not even a funny comparison, 10x+ force strength on RU side. And with an army made to fight a long, bitter, non-nuclear war.
2 ARMY groups of mechanized Hyperbaric MLRS on RU side. And cheap air defense. Meanwhile nato MLRS is conventional AND pretty much obsolete since 2003.
The only good thing so far is Democrats literally used a filibuster to stop even sanctions against RU. (which would have just fucked families in Europe who rely on RU pipelines for heat..)
The CIA likes to do things and blame others for them
We know this from Wikileaks' CIA leaked hack-blame virtual false flag tools: VAULT7::MARBLE::UMBRAGE
Ok Jack you're off the hook....for now
You're starting to tell the story like it is...a NARRATIVE pushed by uniparty RINOs and deepstaters
https://nitter.net/JackPosobiec/status/1482055994461114380#m
Russia is way stronger than anyone US has ever fought- including russia in WW2. This is foolish. Most likely would be proxy conflict such as in Syria which would take heat off Ukraine
It wouldn't look anything like a war. The NATO / RU matchup is ludicrous. NATO has zero chance of stopping RU. Its not even a funny comparison, 10x+ force strength on RU side. And with an army made to fight a long, bitter, non-nuclear war.
2 ARMY groups of mechanized Hyperbaric MLRS on RU side. And cheap air defense. Meanwhile nato MLRS is conventional AND pretty much obsolete since 2003.
The only good thing so far is Democrats literally used a filibuster to stop even sanctions against RU. (which would have just fucked families in Europe who rely on RU pipelines for heat..)