13
Comments (6)
sorted by:
7
pkvi [S] 7 points ago +7 / -0

Any pol who ever says "for free" shd be executed for treason against the american people. Nothing is for free.. we pay for it. We pay for all of it. We pay to be told its free.

5
Candelabro2 5 points ago +5 / -0

Using our money to create more useless symbols the sheep can hide behind. "You have no reason not to wear a high quality mask! They're just giving em to us!" And I'm sure there will be some sort of government program attached to this development

3
thesarl 3 points ago +3 / -0

So they’re going to double down? I guess they really don’t want to start a fake war... or they don’t think they can.

3
SuicideTruthbomber 3 points ago +3 / -0

Nuclear Biological Chemical preparedness? More profitable to sell these? 3M is an American company.

2
pkvi [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

More inclined to believe a new something like you suggest.. bcuz to downplay the cohoax but shill more aggressive masking is total incongruity.

3
Arturhawkwing 3 points ago +3 / -0

Companies on Amazon (startups), had tried to sell n95 equivalents for all of 2021. The whole justification for forcing everyone to wear a mask was that there weren't enough n95's available for medical professionals, so the public had to ALL mask up with shitty masks to protect each other. You couldn't just say "make the vulnerable wear n95; I'll take my chances."

So several startups ramped up production so that anyone who wanted an n95 could have one. But...they were banned from selling them to anyone but medical facilities. Even though there was no longer a shortage, they weren't allowed to sell them to the general public.

That is, of course, because it wasn't about protecting each other. It's hard to sell a pandemic if you don't have visual reminders that you are surrounded by walking biobombs.

Funny to see them pushing n95s now. The whole point of n95 is that we should now be able to say no thanks to masks and let the vulnerable take them. Somehow I don't think that will be how they decree it.