Comments (17)
sorted by:
scholasticus 11 points ago +11 / -0

Its also caused by automated bots throwing out people's resumes and the companies never seeing them. Or HR whores throwing out all men's resumes.

deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
deleted 5 points ago +6 / -1
Shillip -6 points ago +1 / -7

What have you contributed to the white man's world other than fear and propaganda online?

deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
Shillip -5 points ago +1 / -6

Fucking twink prostitutes you met on grindr hardly constitutes "employment."

Junionthepipeline 3 points ago +3 / -0

Must be hard for you to be this stupid.hurry up and take a few more vaccine shots and your problem should clear right up.

Shillip -4 points ago +1 / -5

U 4got 2 switch alts again bro

wtfppl 2 points ago +2 / -0

Out of 250+ applicants we hired six whites and two Latinos.. Cause they were the only people who seem to care enough to KNOW and study about industrial equipment and parts, or have the ability to learn fast and accurately and do research without guidance.

I went to this shit after being high end cook for twelve years cause more scratch and rest time.

Also, city demands a quota, but has no punishment for not meeting quota. Rules to appear to uphold virtue.

DeplorableGerman 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'll take THIS thought experiment over the OP's. Sorry not sorry, Zap_Powerz. Many HAVE died, but many more refuse to work under these conditions and many more still are simply turned away or have their resumés burried. "Do not attribute to [...]" ;)

TrustNo1 2 points ago +2 / -0

Even here in Australia there are news ads on special reports for the "great resignation" that's coming. What fucking resignation? Who and why would there be masses of people resigning from their jobs?

KiloRomeo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks for posting this. You’re not crazy I’ve thought the same thing. I even posted sky this a while back. I found some data for this where i placed it at 1-1.5%. I did this by comparing labor participation rate to job openings rates.

IGOexiled -1 points ago +1 / -2

We know that only between 1 and 10% of adverse reactions are reported

You can't know this. Unknown unknowns.

KiloRomeo 3 points ago +3 / -0

You can actually. I saw a study on this back in august. Basically they estimate it by using other conditions that have known population rates. For instance, how many people got condition X where X is generally understood to be unrelated to vax damage. Then compare the rates and you have your estimate. This method places it at ~25x

BigOT 2 points ago +2 / -0