EDIT: Happy to be corrected here, I'm not well read on immunology.
Interesting that even inactivated virus vaccines can be dangerous (basically all 4 vaccines here suspected of inducing hypersensitivity to the virus -> immune system goes into overdrive on reinfection -> vaxxed get sicker than unvaxxed on reinfection with the same virus). I guess I was wrong about them being no worse than the disease. In case of reinfection in unvaxxed animals:
the infiltrates were nearly 100% monocytes and lymphocytes without the eosinophil component seen in the vaccinated challenged animals. [i.e. no Th2-type immunopathologic reaction]
TLDR:
Thus, a Th2-type immunopathologic reaction on challenge of vaccinated animals has occurred in three of four animal models (not in hamsters) including two different inbred mouse strains with four different types of SARS-CoV vaccines with and without alum adjuvant. An inactivated vaccine preparation that does not induce this result in mice, ferrets and nonhuman primates has not been reported.
If this is happening with our vaccines, more hopitalizations and deaths. They might blame it on Omicron or some variant and go for lockdowns? This study, if it holds for COVID vaccines, would imply boosters for life / recurring revenue is not the goal (since more boosters -> even more sensitive. They would see that the unvaxxed are fine, so why would they keep taking it)? I guess they would want no one to be unvaxxed so there would be no control group to compare to?
If so, pretty cool strategy by the elite. Basically without releasing a dangerous virus (just a mild one), they still cause the damage of a much more dangerous virus -> can kill off enough people to initiate lockdown?
There's too much resistance to Australia-type lockdowns (without mass deaths), so they go for Dark Winter type lockdown where there are many deaths and people will willingly comply (but deaths caused by immune system overreaction due to vaccines, not the virus itself. But without a control group of unvaxxed, how could you know)?
There’s a way to prove it through dose dependent response relationships. Essentially the 1 vax vs 2,3,4,…. etc and then compare ratio of neutralizing antibodies to no specific immunity response (monocytes/lymphocytes etc). It’s called “antigenic sin”. I’m studying it now. Seems to explain why some people get a serious case and others get asymptomatic.
EDIT: Happy to be corrected here, I'm not well read on immunology.
Interesting that even inactivated virus vaccines can be dangerous (basically all 4 vaccines here suspected of inducing hypersensitivity to the virus -> immune system goes into overdrive on reinfection -> vaxxed get sicker than unvaxxed on reinfection with the same virus). I guess I was wrong about them being no worse than the disease. In case of reinfection in unvaxxed animals:
TLDR:
If this is happening with our vaccines, more hopitalizations and deaths. They might blame it on Omicron or some variant and go for lockdowns? This study, if it holds for COVID vaccines, would imply boosters for life / recurring revenue is not the goal (since more boosters -> even more sensitive. They would see that the unvaxxed are fine, so why would they keep taking it)? I guess they would want no one to be unvaxxed so there would be no control group to compare to?
If so, pretty cool strategy by the elite. Basically without releasing a dangerous virus (just a mild one), they still cause the damage of a much more dangerous virus -> can kill off enough people to initiate lockdown?
There's too much resistance to Australia-type lockdowns (without mass deaths), so they go for Dark Winter type lockdown where there are many deaths and people will willingly comply (but deaths caused by immune system overreaction due to vaccines, not the virus itself. But without a control group of unvaxxed, how could you know)?
There’s a way to prove it through dose dependent response relationships. Essentially the 1 vax vs 2,3,4,…. etc and then compare ratio of neutralizing antibodies to no specific immunity response (monocytes/lymphocytes etc). It’s called “antigenic sin”. I’m studying it now. Seems to explain why some people get a serious case and others get asymptomatic.