So being considered 'radical' nowadays is literally following the science?
Following scient-ism implies consenting to whoever suggested the -ism; which gives them the power to redefine it at will. Science [Latin scientia, from scio, to know.] implies to perceive (knowledge equals perception).
The whole "trust the science" pitch implies consenting (trust) to suggestion (scientism) aka choice to choice aka will to will; hence submission of consenting will to suggesting will of others. This contract is called religion [Latin religio, from religo, to bind anew].
Following scient-ism implies consenting to whoever suggested the -ism; which gives them the power to redefine it at will. Science [Latin scientia, from scio, to know.] implies to perceive (knowledge equals perception).
The whole "trust the science" pitch implies consenting (trust) to suggestion (scientism) aka choice to choice aka will to will; hence submission of consenting will to suggesting will of others. This contract is called religion [Latin religio, from religo, to bind anew].
Bad bot.