Nobody wanted bloody murderous Bolsheviks to kill millions of Russians. The Bolsheviks unleashed the Red Terror and killed millions of Russians. (Despite everyone in Russia was fighting them)
Nobody wanted 3 decades consisted of two World Wars in a row. "We're going to war whether you like it or not" -- the Warmongering trolls said to the rulers of the world. And the 3 decade long world wars occurred anyways.
Now back to the present day:
At least in America or Europe, nobody wanted the neverending covid world to materialize. The enemy still runs at full cycle as if nobody is standing in their way anymore. (And in some places, the enemy is completely unopposed)
The Omicron scare mongering is a proof that they now believe that all opposition ceased to exist.
Are we any different now from what we are in Russia 1917 or World War II? The arms and knowledge might be better, but when the people refuse to change -- having been overestimated their boundaries and refusing to look back at the past (where EVERYONE FOUGHT TO THE BITTER END but still failed and for good reasons), the results are inevitably the same.
I have thought about this too.
If it was not for politicians and governments, would the world have all this misery. Most people just want to live their lives.
If it was not for some despot, leader, et all, most people would just live their lives.
theres a really good book, by some german psycho-analyst. and if i remember the name, ill repost here.
he states that there is a finite number of people, as part of a group, that can function as a group and maintain harmony.
his samples study native tribes in africa which documents tribes that fell into disarray once they reached a certain population number and ones that continually maintained harmony.
he retested several times across africa and south america.
proving his hypothesis, there is an approximate number, that once reached, eventually lead to the destabilizing of the tribe.
he also documents certain factors that determine how large the tribe could become w/o destabilizing. some factors included... farmers/hunter-gatherers, accessibility to water/food, weather, migration patterns/length, ideology of war, and relative relation to other tribes in the region.
fascinating read.
basically, hitting the tipping point would most always result into the tribe destabilizing. on the other hand, the optimum size of a successful tribe, factoring in all the variables, is half the number of the tipping point.