Same thing could be said about science, only difference is that there exist no evidence that their scientific theories are true, it is all faith based. People saw it on TV, so they assumed it must be true.
Big bang is nothing more then a theory. No proof exist that Einsteins theories holds up, in fact all you are going to find is that he has been disproved, e=mc2 does not even work. 300 years later we still have no proof that Newtons theory of gravity holds up, people were able to explain why things fall even before Newton, any idea that two objects attracts each other is just false. NASA, the Moon landing, ISS and Mars rovers, all fake, can not be confirmed by anyone outside of the governments Freemasons.
Choice/choice in ignorance of balance (to bind anew) creates choice/choice in ignorance of balance. The essence of the religion (to bind anew) is not the original bond, but the will to submit to others.
The original bond under natural law represents offer/consent. As form (life) within flow (inception towards death) we each represent choice (consent) within balance (offer). To bind anew implies choice consenting to suggested choices of others aka to submit to the will of others.
In short: original bond represents balance/choice; religion (to bind anew) represents choice
In short: original bond represents balance/choice; religion (to bind anew) represents choice
Just choice implies without balance, yet as choice one represents the response to balance aka being within balance with the choice to either adhere to it or ignore it. Ignorance (imbalance) represents a state within balance.
"free" will of choice represents response to the "dom"inance of balance. Therefore; free-dom implies being free within being dominated. The suggested choices of others deceive us to ignore balance; but it's always there; while our choice of want over need imbalances us.
Same thing could be said about science, only difference is that there exist no evidence that their scientific theories are true, it is all faith based. People saw it on TV, so they assumed it must be true.
Big bang is nothing more then a theory. No proof exist that Einsteins theories holds up, in fact all you are going to find is that he has been disproved, e=mc2 does not even work. 300 years later we still have no proof that Newtons theory of gravity holds up, people were able to explain why things fall even before Newton, any idea that two objects attracts each other is just false. NASA, the Moon landing, ISS and Mars rovers, all fake, can not be confirmed by anyone outside of the governments Freemasons.
SCI'ENCE, noun [Latin scientia, from scio, to know.] + KNOW, verb transitive [Latin nosco, cognosco.] - "to perceive".
What if consent to suggested scientism corrupts understanding of perceived knowledge?
Choice/choice in ignorance of balance (to bind anew) creates choice/choice in ignorance of balance. The essence of the religion (to bind anew) is not the original bond, but the will to submit to others.
The original bond under natural law represents offer/consent. As form (life) within flow (inception towards death) we each represent choice (consent) within balance (offer). To bind anew implies choice consenting to suggested choices of others aka to submit to the will of others.
In short: original bond represents balance/choice; religion (to bind anew) represents choice
Just choice implies without balance, yet as choice one represents the response to balance aka being within balance with the choice to either adhere to it or ignore it. Ignorance (imbalance) represents a state within balance.
"free" will of choice represents response to the "dom"inance of balance. Therefore; free-dom implies being free within being dominated. The suggested choices of others deceive us to ignore balance; but it's always there; while our choice of want over need imbalances us.
Therefore, we are free to choose what we want and need, but we are never free to choose what we want over what we need.
As the tree grows, it is only free to grow within its nature; and it is not free to grow outside its nature.
The choices we make are in balance, and the choices we make are within our nature.
If you want to be free, you must be in balance, and you must be within your nature.