What you perceive to be useful represents the ongoing revisionism of idolized meaning (words); which allow you two reference points (1828 + 2021) for your assumptions of changes made upon suggested meaning.

Now try to allow yourself to question a bunch of fundamentals relating to this...

a) knowledge represents perception aka perceived inspiration; not suggested information.

b) before suggested word comes perceived sound and the choice of others to shape it into words, which they suggest to you as meaning; which only then allows the ongoing revisionism thereof...if you consent to the suggested meaning.

c) Latin to Pig-Latin (English) robbed it of all natural connotations, so the 1828 version with the Latin origins added allows a peak behind the curtain of revisionism, yet still requires the perspective of natural law to understand what it is that words are describing/obfuscating.

d) "exemption from the power or control of another" implies sole authority over free will of choice among the free ONEs, yet leaves out the dominance of the ALL that each ONE exists within aka exists in response to. Control over having choice implies being controlled by balance; hence in response to it.

e) "freedom is personal, civil, political, and religious" represents a deception based upon the ignorance of free-dom (balance) by adding the suggested civil; political and religious to the natural state of person aka per sonos aka by sound aka ONE person out of ALL sound.

f) "privileges" aka PRIV'ILEGE, noun [Latin privilegium; privus, separate, private, and lex, law; originally a private law, some public act that regarded an individual.] ignores that all separation (individual ONEs) happens within aka out of the collective ALL aka form within flow; with flow representing the collective laws of nature for all the individual form within; hence us being in response to natural law.

g) "Power of enjoying" obfuscates understanding of power of velocity (flow) causing power of resistance (form); by suggesting temptation (joy) aka choice of want over need; therefore ignorance of perceived need for suggested want (those oh so joyful privileges of convenience stores; pornography; religious freedom; education; entertainment; political representatives etc.)

h) suggesting that "Exemption from necessity" represents "freedom of the will" ignores that free will of choice is defined by the balance of need/want for for form within flow. Will can only choose to ignore balance; not being exempt from its necessity; since choice represents the reaction to balance aka being defined by it.

i) Suggesting "Ease or facility of doing any thing" ignores that being ONE thing within ALL things prevents doing nothing. This is the temptation of sloth by ignorance towards need of constant adaptation.

j) "Frankness; boldness" imply deception chosen upon for suggestion towards choice of others. Choice needs to respond to balance; while resisting the suggested choices by others.

k) "License" (permission) and resulting threats of violation of law represents suggested choice to restrict ones own free will of choice when consenting to them. The laws of nature (flow upon form) offer "free" will of choice aka unrestricted choice within balance, because that's what's needed for balancing within constant movement (adaptation).