They did "protect" Julian Assange by giving him more coverage. Alex Jones is also a pro-Trump Zionist mole.
If people really get destroyed over "truthing" for any reason but shock value, Everyone who ever participated on this board will vanish in dead silence. And I meant dead silence, no reports, nothing. You just seem them one day no longer post anything and .win is shut down entirely, and this is your sole warning.
What if all suggested information represents "controlled opposition" to perceived inspiration? Media [Latin medius, middle.]...what if the entire apparatus of suggested information represents the parasitic "middle"-man between perceived inspiration and choice based adaptation to it?
They did "protect" Julian Assange by giving him more coverage. Alex Jones is also a pro-Trump Zionist mole.
If people really get destroyed over "truthing" for any reason but shock value, Everyone who ever participated on this board will vanish in dead silence. And I meant dead silence, no reports, nothing. You just seem them one day no longer post anything and .win is shut down entirely, and this is your sole warning.
Broadcasting him openly on TV is effectively protecting him or indirectly giving him more attention than what they supposedly believe he deserves.
Always remember one thing. If you really hate someone, you do not give them unwanted attention. Just let them echo in silence.
What if all suggested information represents "controlled opposition" to perceived inspiration? Media [Latin medius, middle.]...what if the entire apparatus of suggested information represents the parasitic "middle"-man between perceived inspiration and choice based adaptation to it?
Imagine saying James Okeefe is controlled opposition, but Alex Jones is not in the same sentence. Oy vey