I do not understand how it's dooming or insanity when I say that the "1 month lockdowns" will come in starting from next year and when people take this shit down after a decade, society will be damaged to a point where repairing the aftermath will take at least one century.
It's pretty evident this is all but an inevitable right? Based on recent events, it most probably is.
Yet if I talked about this in anywhere but here, even anti-vaxxers will call me a schizo.
I do not have a job now, I am now 25 years old and I refuse to find a job under the fear of mask mandates that are so bad that if you go out without a mask people will treat you like a super spreader. This is ongoing for 20 months and will probably go 120 more. If you do not understand how this relates to my situation, what I meant is the situation is pretty darn bleak.
"If you don't like your life, change it" is a universal truth. Go somewhere that won't eat you.
Where are we all going then? This will affect all urban areas and suburbs. No place with people will be spared, not in the UK, not in Utah, and most certainly not in Ghana or the Samoa Islands. If you don't have skills to survive the wilderness or an abandoned urban area hell is the only option.
Strike "truth" and try life being moved allows one the choice to shape it.
Universal form unitas - "the state of being one aka oneness" implies being a temporary ONE response to ALL ongoing movement. Both suggested "truth" and "like" are causing the conflict of reason aka true vs false and like vs not like. As ONE within ALL there's no conflict (want vs not want); only balance (need/want) for choice of response; yet want represents ignorance of need, and ignorance corrupts understanding of all this.
Following your inter self to allow your life to change. Want and need intertwining you to step out, risk no longer matters.
Life is being moved from inception towards death aka within constant change. As form (life) within flow (inception towards death); life is tempted to "want" to follow the velocity of flow; but needs to resist as form within.
Before choice can ALLOW', verb transitive - [Latin loco, to lay, set, place.] anything; it needs to respond to balance (need/want) caused by change aka the momentum (balance for form) of motion (flow).
Want/need represent a balance of natural opposites for the responding choice in-between, just like inception/death represent the balance for the life in-between. As for risk...inception predefines death; so outcome of life is predefined; which puts all the value into balance; which the responding choice represents the evaluation thereof for self sustenance.
The ongoing movement represents both the RISK, noun "hazard; danger; peril; exposure to harm" aka ongoing loss for form; but also the temporary growth for form. Choice within balance defines growth (need) or loss (want) aka self sustenance or temptation to ignore it.
Matter represents form within flow (that's us); while no represents choice to ignore everything (need) for suggested nothing (want); which then corrupts the length of life. So "no longer matters" represents a suggested rhetoric to deceive us into ignorance.
"So "no longer matters" represents a suggested rhetoric to deceive us into ignorance."
What part of no longer matters becomes reality when you step out on a limb of life? Why argue with salad bot?