I think everything we think we “know” about archeology and carbon dating, just might not be right. I mean, we’ve just “learned” it all in the past hundred years or so, for the most part.... right?
The gatekeepers of knowledge play the long game.
What could part of the plan look like to break through the historical gate keeping (of previous control via religious indoctrination/intimidation) when the world is getting so intelligently connected and can discuss and/or dismiss such things? Their control tactics have to evolve, as well.
This has been on my mind a lot lately, since I visited the petrified forest a few years ago.
Carbon dating is compete bullshit. It is circular reasoning. It is based of "knowledge" off of ancient Egyptian pyramids and Pompeii. They "know" about Egypt, some how, and Pompeii some how, therefor they know carbon dating.
The biggest redpill is that Pompeii erupted in 1631, relative to our current year. People spent a long time studying ancient maps to come to this year. There is a pineapple on a fresco in Pompeii. All of history as you are taught is a lie.
That’s basically what my friend, who is a pastors wife, told the kids as we wandered through the petrified forest.
35-40 years ago I cut myself off from such talk, bc I was “educated”. And I wanted away from those who weren’t.
Yet her answers made more sense than any intellectual I’ve ever heard. (And I’m not particularly religious... which also goes back to 35-40 years ago, and is all about the original Karen’s and the original cancel culture.)
And now we see how these people lie about anything and everything. It’s like they are abandoning the control they had over people via God, and have decided the new religion will be science and technology. And the people didn’t arrive there organically, no matter what they think. They were definitely steered there.
And 50% of the reason I feel this way, is watching the scientific community and how they drown out or hide anyone who doesn’t comply. A few times, satirical studies have been published that shows just that... but then even that fades and gets forgotten.
I think everything we think we “know” about archeology and carbon dating, just might not be right. I mean, we’ve just “learned” it all in the past hundred years or so, for the most part.... right?
The gatekeepers of knowledge play the long game.
What could part of the plan look like to break through the historical gate keeping (of previous control via religious indoctrination/intimidation) when the world is getting so intelligently connected and can discuss and/or dismiss such things? Their control tactics have to evolve, as well.
This has been on my mind a lot lately, since I visited the petrified forest a few years ago.
Carbon dating is compete bullshit. It is circular reasoning. It is based of "knowledge" off of ancient Egyptian pyramids and Pompeii. They "know" about Egypt, some how, and Pompeii some how, therefor they know carbon dating.
The biggest redpill is that Pompeii erupted in 1631, relative to our current year. People spent a long time studying ancient maps to come to this year. There is a pineapple on a fresco in Pompeii. All of history as you are taught is a lie.
That’s basically what my friend, who is a pastors wife, told the kids as we wandered through the petrified forest.
35-40 years ago I cut myself off from such talk, bc I was “educated”. And I wanted away from those who weren’t.
Yet her answers made more sense than any intellectual I’ve ever heard. (And I’m not particularly religious... which also goes back to 35-40 years ago, and is all about the original Karen’s and the original cancel culture.)
And now we see how these people lie about anything and everything. It’s like they are abandoning the control they had over people via God, and have decided the new religion will be science and technology. And the people didn’t arrive there organically, no matter what they think. They were definitely steered there.
And 50% of the reason I feel this way, is watching the scientific community and how they drown out or hide anyone who doesn’t comply. A few times, satirical studies have been published that shows just that... but then even that fades and gets forgotten.