I think everything we think we “know” about archeology and carbon dating, just might not be right. I mean, we’ve just “learned” it all in the past hundred years or so, for the most part.... right?
The gatekeepers of knowledge play the long game.
What could part of the plan look like to break through the historical gate keeping (of previous control via religious indoctrination/intimidation) when the world is getting so intelligently connected and can discuss and/or dismiss such things? Their control tactics have to evolve, as well.
This has been on my mind a lot lately, since I visited the petrified forest a few years ago.
This really caught my attention with red heads. People really think red heads are different. From their hair and skin color to their blood type. My dad was a 6+ redhead. I’ve heard them called aliens, for real. (There are sites dedicated to it.)
I have followed the giants, and have always wondered.... were they really giants, or were they average size for today’s humans?
Specifically, those who evolved around the equator were smaller and stockier in statue. (True, or false... idk). Those who evolved closer to the poles had less of a gravitational pull and were taller and leaner. (Could that even be true?)
But then, “Eskimos” and other North American natives don’t make sense......
Did they gravitate North later, but evolved further south? What about the Native South Americans and Africans? Did they tend to grow larger the further from the equator they were? Is the folklore of the Amazon women true?
What explains the differences?
(And this is all taking certain assumptions for granted.)
My point is, were they really giants, or just larger than the people that the exposed people were used to?
Red hair is a totally different subject than size, as is blood types.
Carbon dating is compete bullshit. It is circular reasoning. It is based of "knowledge" off of ancient Egyptian pyramids and Pompeii. They "know" about Egypt, some how, and Pompeii some how, therefor they know carbon dating.
The biggest redpill is that Pompeii erupted in 1631, relative to our current year. People spent a long time studying ancient maps to come to this year. There is a pineapple on a fresco in Pompeii. All of history as you are taught is a lie.
That’s basically what my friend, who is a pastors wife, told the kids as we wandered through the petrified forest.
35-40 years ago I cut myself off from such talk, bc I was “educated”. And I wanted away from those who weren’t.
Yet her answers made more sense than any intellectual I’ve ever heard. (And I’m not particularly religious... which also goes back to 35-40 years ago, and is all about the original Karen’s and the original cancel culture.)
And now we see how these people lie about anything and everything. It’s like they are abandoning the control they had over people via God, and have decided the new religion will be science and technology. And the people didn’t arrive there organically, no matter what they think. They were definitely steered there.
And 50% of the reason I feel this way, is watching the scientific community and how they drown out or hide anyone who doesn’t comply. A few times, satirical studies have been published that shows just that... but then even that fades and gets forgotten.
KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists". Life is being moved from inception towards death and perception of movement represents communicated inspiration towards our senses. Inspiration requires choice of reaction to it; while choice represents the response to the balance of need/want.
Therefore...responding to perceived inspiration represents ones choice of need; while ignoring it for the suggested information by others represents ones choice of want.
The few suggest information as knowledge; while deceiving the many to ignore the only source of knowledge...perceived inspiration. Consent to suggested information is what allows those who suggest it to also withhold it from those who want it.
I’ve seen it somewhere else the last couple of days. Makes more sense the second time around reading it. It might have been from your previous comments, idk- but it’s good. I do like it.
Ones inner struggle to resist want for need aka ignorance for self sustenance aka suggested information for perceived inspiration. Keep at it and it will a) take the restrictions (-isms) off your consciousness and b) grow your comprehension of all perceived; but no other one can make that choice for you.
I think everything we think we “know” about archeology and carbon dating, just might not be right. I mean, we’ve just “learned” it all in the past hundred years or so, for the most part.... right?
The gatekeepers of knowledge play the long game.
What could part of the plan look like to break through the historical gate keeping (of previous control via religious indoctrination/intimidation) when the world is getting so intelligently connected and can discuss and/or dismiss such things? Their control tactics have to evolve, as well.
This has been on my mind a lot lately, since I visited the petrified forest a few years ago.
They sure cover up every giant skeleton they find.
Ask the natives, they supposedly slaughtered red-haired giants when they came to America.
Image 2
Image 3
This really caught my attention with red heads. People really think red heads are different. From their hair and skin color to their blood type. My dad was a 6+ redhead. I’ve heard them called aliens, for real. (There are sites dedicated to it.)
I have followed the giants, and have always wondered.... were they really giants, or were they average size for today’s humans?
Specifically, those who evolved around the equator were smaller and stockier in statue. (True, or false... idk). Those who evolved closer to the poles had less of a gravitational pull and were taller and leaner. (Could that even be true?)
But then, “Eskimos” and other North American natives don’t make sense......
Did they gravitate North later, but evolved further south? What about the Native South Americans and Africans? Did they tend to grow larger the further from the equator they were? Is the folklore of the Amazon women true?
What explains the differences?
(And this is all taking certain assumptions for granted.)
My point is, were they really giants, or just larger than the people that the exposed people were used to?
Red hair is a totally different subject than size, as is blood types.
Carbon dating is compete bullshit. It is circular reasoning. It is based of "knowledge" off of ancient Egyptian pyramids and Pompeii. They "know" about Egypt, some how, and Pompeii some how, therefor they know carbon dating.
The biggest redpill is that Pompeii erupted in 1631, relative to our current year. People spent a long time studying ancient maps to come to this year. There is a pineapple on a fresco in Pompeii. All of history as you are taught is a lie.
That’s basically what my friend, who is a pastors wife, told the kids as we wandered through the petrified forest.
35-40 years ago I cut myself off from such talk, bc I was “educated”. And I wanted away from those who weren’t.
Yet her answers made more sense than any intellectual I’ve ever heard. (And I’m not particularly religious... which also goes back to 35-40 years ago, and is all about the original Karen’s and the original cancel culture.)
And now we see how these people lie about anything and everything. It’s like they are abandoning the control they had over people via God, and have decided the new religion will be science and technology. And the people didn’t arrive there organically, no matter what they think. They were definitely steered there.
And 50% of the reason I feel this way, is watching the scientific community and how they drown out or hide anyone who doesn’t comply. A few times, satirical studies have been published that shows just that... but then even that fades and gets forgotten.
KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists". Life is being moved from inception towards death and perception of movement represents communicated inspiration towards our senses. Inspiration requires choice of reaction to it; while choice represents the response to the balance of need/want.
Therefore...responding to perceived inspiration represents ones choice of need; while ignoring it for the suggested information by others represents ones choice of want.
The few suggest information as knowledge; while deceiving the many to ignore the only source of knowledge...perceived inspiration. Consent to suggested information is what allows those who suggest it to also withhold it from those who want it.
This made my head hurt to think, but I like it.
I’ve seen it somewhere else the last couple of days. Makes more sense the second time around reading it. It might have been from your previous comments, idk- but it’s good. I do like it.
Ones inner struggle to resist want for need aka ignorance for self sustenance aka suggested information for perceived inspiration. Keep at it and it will a) take the restrictions (-isms) off your consciousness and b) grow your comprehension of all perceived; but no other one can make that choice for you.