KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists". Each ONE perceives ALL; yet lacks comprehension of what it means. Adaptation by choice of reaction to perceived inspiration is what grows comprehension; while consenting to suggested information by others corrupts understanding.
jewish shit
Nature doesn't brand anything; it moves everything; which those within perceive as inspiration to react to by choice. The origin of all words represents misuse of choice to shape perceived sound into idolized meaning; which is being misused to suggested substitute meaning to the choice of others to deceive them to ignore that the value of ALL meaning is communicated through balance; while the responding choice represents the evaluation thereof.
There's not higher value than evaluation.
How about consent to any suggestion causing the conflict between wanting vs not wanting the suggested; which is called the conflict of reason. The few use suggestion (-isms) to cause division (reason); which allows them a) to control both sides of every conflict and b) can be indefinitely prolonged by the suggestion of contradictions to both sides within reason. This is called talmudic reasoning.
Meanwhile; the so called talmud (a tool mimicking ego) suggests to use implication (if/then) over reason (want vs not want; true vs false; good vs bad etc.) thereby staying within natural law (defined by flow upon form) instead of participating in the ignorance based conflicts (reason) thereof.
KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists". Each ONE perceives ALL; yet lacks comprehension of what it means. Adaptation by choice of reaction to perceived inspiration is what grows comprehension; while consenting to suggested information by others corrupts understanding.
Nature doesn't brand anything; it moves everything; which those within perceive as inspiration to react to by choice. The origin of all words represents misuse of choice to shape perceived sound into idolized meaning; which is being misused to suggested substitute meaning to the choice of others to deceive them to ignore that the value of ALL meaning is communicated through balance; while the responding choice represents the evaluation thereof.
There's not higher value than evaluation.
How about consent to any suggestion causing the conflict between wanting vs not wanting the suggested; which is called the conflict of reason. The few use suggestion (-isms) to cause division (reason); which allows them a) to control both sides of every conflict and b) can be indefinitely prolonged by the suggestion of contradictions to both sides within reason. This is called talmudic reasoning.
Meanwhile; the so called talmud (a tool mimicking ego) suggests to use implication (if/then) over reason (want vs not want; true vs false; good vs bad etc.) thereby staying within natural law (defined by flow upon form) instead of participating in the ignorance based conflicts (reason) thereof.