I'm copy/pasting a comment I made from a few weeks ago:

This post goes nicely with an article I just read about Mayim Bialik.

Supposedly, she caught flack for being "anti-vaccine" in an older book of hers, and the article was there to clear things up for everyone.

They let us know that yes, she did vaccinate her children, and will be getting the COVID "vaccine". Can't have a neuroscientist be anti-science.

But most peculiarly, Mayim herself weighs in on the criticism in the article, "I have never, not once, said that vaccines are not valuable, not useful, or not necessary-because they are," she said. "I received a ton of negative press about this and to be quite honest, most of it was inaccurate. The internet jury decided I was a danger to my children, a disgrace to science, and a member of the Hollywood elite responsible for the killing of babies." A bit too on the nose, huh?

The article about Bialik is from bestlifeonline.com, btw.

I have a few other thoughts on the matter, and may even make a post about this. I would like to point out the absolute victimhood mentality (she received a "ton" of negative press...sure), and the really anti-science view that "vaccines are necessary". No rational scientist would say that, hell, I would wager no rational person would really say that.

Hey Mayim sweetie...You're not one of the elite. That's why you gotta work for a living. You're just elite adjacent.