pRoHiBiTeD ClAiM
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (13)
sorted by:
Implication (if/then) over reason (true vs false) as the talmud so insidiously exploits through suggestions.
To consent to believe (true) or not believe (false) any suggestion represents an ownership claim over meaning, so if you respond within reason, you already failed the shit test of ignoring what nature offers for what others suggest it means.
Nature offers inspiration to the senses of all within by moving them; hence inspiring reaction by choice (adaptation); hence choice representing a response to balance...not to the suggested information by the choice of others. All suggested information represents "false" information within a system that communicates itself through inspiration.
The conflict of reason between true versus false information represents a response to a suggested choice; hence representing ones choice to want (true) or not want (false) the suggested information. When nature offers inspiration; one "needs" to adapt to it by choice of reaction; while one is tempted to "want" to ignore it for the suggested information by other ones.