So why bring up race? Nobody mentioned race. Have the racism argument with someone who wants to argue race.
To my point. Sodomites are trying to make it okay for the Catholic Church to accept their behavior, and from inside the church at that. There has been an infiltration, books have been written about it.
You see, it's a conspiracy on the conspiracy theory board...so, let's talk about it. The issue isn't their sodomy, per se (except for the unwilling kids involved here and the Boy Scouts, etc. etc.) but rather that they don't leave the church. Why?
[edit: it's also a conspiracy how bishops covered up for gay priests for decades upon decades of abuse]
Don’t know what a “handsake account” is, but I assume it’s some terminology you’re leveraging to undermine my legitimacy or something.
My point was that I see a perpetual impulse to “other” which I think is sign of an intellectual weakness. You’re implying that the offending priests are not actually Catholic but “faggots” (as if one can’t be both.) I’m going to assume that you wouldn’t be this generous with the malleability of your definitions if we were talking about Muslims or Jews.
"handshake" means you're new here, as there is a little "handshake" symbol right next to your username if you care to look, which occurs with new accounts. There is a purpose behind that happening. Can you guess why? You might actually have not known that, so now you do.
Why do you keep bringing up things I'm not talking about. You want to debate Jews and Muslims, go debate it with someone who wants to debate about Jews and Muslims.
As for "othering" (which is a word that lets me know way more about you than you intended) what I was doing was defining things by their true name. “The beginning of wisdom is to call things by their proper name.” People who engage in sodomy, and who molest young boys are sodomites. It's the exact opposite of intellectual weakness.
Considering that it's virtually all underage boys getting molested here, they're gay, or faggots, or sodomites, or whatever label you'd prefer.
If you fail to see my point, then I'm going to chalk that up to a cognitive failure on your part. Your intellectual weakness is revealed in many facets of the way that you speak and your charming use of the word "faggot" is only one of them.
You're shilling for them so you're most likely lying.
And you're the stupid shit fed hick who went to a government school and graduated with that legendary 8th grade education from the 12th guvurmunt gray'd.
You're the stupid motherfucker who grew up and joined the slavery, child molester party because it seemed to you like those HAD to be the good guys in history.
Because you're a stupid, shit-fed, govermunt skewl't
Handsake account. Mkay.
So why bring up race? Nobody mentioned race. Have the racism argument with someone who wants to argue race.
To my point. Sodomites are trying to make it okay for the Catholic Church to accept their behavior, and from inside the church at that. There has been an infiltration, books have been written about it.
You see, it's a conspiracy on the conspiracy theory board...so, let's talk about it. The issue isn't their sodomy, per se (except for the unwilling kids involved here and the Boy Scouts, etc. etc.) but rather that they don't leave the church. Why?
[edit: it's also a conspiracy how bishops covered up for gay priests for decades upon decades of abuse]
Don’t know what a “handsake account” is, but I assume it’s some terminology you’re leveraging to undermine my legitimacy or something.
My point was that I see a perpetual impulse to “other” which I think is sign of an intellectual weakness. You’re implying that the offending priests are not actually Catholic but “faggots” (as if one can’t be both.) I’m going to assume that you wouldn’t be this generous with the malleability of your definitions if we were talking about Muslims or Jews.
"handshake" means you're new here, as there is a little "handshake" symbol right next to your username if you care to look, which occurs with new accounts. There is a purpose behind that happening. Can you guess why? You might actually have not known that, so now you do.
Why do you keep bringing up things I'm not talking about. You want to debate Jews and Muslims, go debate it with someone who wants to debate about Jews and Muslims.
As for "othering" (which is a word that lets me know way more about you than you intended) what I was doing was defining things by their true name. “The beginning of wisdom is to call things by their proper name.” People who engage in sodomy, and who molest young boys are sodomites. It's the exact opposite of intellectual weakness.
Considering that it's virtually all underage boys getting molested here, they're gay, or faggots, or sodomites, or whatever label you'd prefer.
If you fail to see my point, then I'm going to chalk that up to a cognitive failure on your part. Your intellectual weakness is revealed in many facets of the way that you speak and your charming use of the word "faggot" is only one of them.
Okay, faggot.
You don't have any legitimacy you're a homosexual.
I'm not a homosexual, but thanks for revealing the full extent of your stupidity.
Also since spitting on homosexuals' heads is something I'm not gonna spend all day doing government schooler,
you're blocked so i don't have to watch you justifying your fetish for cock gobbling pedophiles.
Which means last word's yours.
Make it count, you stupid, shit fed,
guvurnment skewl't,
H.i.C.K.
''Block this homosexual pedophile shilling, guvurmunt skewl't
H.i.c.K?
"Yes."
Click.
You're shilling for them so you're most likely lying.
And you're the stupid shit fed hick who went to a government school and graduated with that legendary 8th grade education from the 12th guvurmunt gray'd.
HicK.
You're a hick.
You're the stupid motherfucker who grew up and joined the slavery, child molester party because it seemed to you like those HAD to be the good guys in history.
Because you're a stupid, shit-fed, govermunt skewl't
H.i.C.K.
Hick.