21
Comments (15)
sorted by:
5
KiloRomeo 5 points ago +6 / -1

More evidence that they created the flat earth movement exists to discredit truthers

4
Xaviermgk 4 points ago +4 / -0

Were you around when Above Top Secret "changed over" and went from being primarily forums to videos?

I have a feeling that's around the time it started kicking up. It's was pretty obvious to me that many of the video makers were masons at the minimum, or that and intelligence agents.

That was when I first started noticing more questionable content in terms of conspiracy theories, personally.

2
KiloRomeo 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think there’s a spectrum something such as:

  • fringe topics (no research, no conspiracy eg. Moon hologram)
  • fringe research topics (not a conspiracy eg. ESP)
  • conspiracy theories
  • conspiracy practices

I think you’re right about people with differing motivation perhaps even antagonistic practices. Having a common epistemology is important to create any sort of progress.

0
nothingberg [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

Stay on topic

1
KiloRomeo 1 point ago +1 / -0

It’s in the title? Lol

2
the-new-style 2 points ago +2 / -0

"Natural Immunity Does not exist"

"Anti-Biotic resistant bugs are becoming more widespread"

pick one

2
HeyJesusBringMeABeer 2 points ago +2 / -0

The human immune system is Godly.

Bottom line. Bend the knee.

2
nothingberg [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Rand Paul said, repeatedly, "Naturally ACQUIRED immunity" not "natural immunity"

I think people are getting tripped up on what people are calling natural immunity when they mean 'acquired immunity'

1
nothingberg [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

True that natural immunity does not exist, but natural resistance DOES and its from people with a strong immune system and they are healthy...they acquire and it doesn't affect them (asymptomatic)

Acquired immunity is really acquired resistance, and it's better than the vaccine, because it's creating multi-target generalized antibodies rather than spike protein specific antibodies

1
conspiracylobby 1 point ago +1 / -0

So you seem rational, tell me what you think of my perspective.

Covid - Sars virus with a spike protein targeting ace2 receptors. A naturally resistant person can kill the virus quickly preventing further replication and less spikes binding to ace2. Less inflammation and lower load in immune system. Older/unhealthy people take longer to fight it off, more replication more spikes.

Vaccine - no virus to fight. Body produces the spike protein itself and immune response is to the spike bonding to ace2, but there is no replication to slow. The body will create the spikes as long as the mRNA is available (guessing 2 weeks).

1
HeyJesusBringMeABeer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Senator Paul is a Good Man

1
MistGorillas 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ahh cheers, somehow didn't see this in my feed all day, hence my own post on it. No disrespect it seems you beat me to the punch.

Fuck Bejabba the hut.

1
Equity1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Unamerican". Yes. Use that word over and over.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
1
Equity1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

A strong argument or rebuke is powerful. It changes peoples' minds and gives a good argument and framing that is hard to refute. It takes the reasons for vaccine mandates away from those peddling them.

While those peddling the mandates and currently have power, can and might still use force to vaccinate people, their legitimacy is eroded by the rebuke and is seen as unreasonable. Using power in this way makes it quickly slip from your grasp.

So, it is not mere political theater. It is a check on the use of mandate powers.