I read that different agencies have their own set of redaction codes, so b4 from the National Archives likely means something different than b4 from the FDA.
EDIT: Even if it did relate to a weapon system, that does not mean the shot itself is a weapon system, but the redacted information could be related to a bioweapon.
You being genuine with this? Read b4 statement. Its about INTERFERING (that would impaire) with a state-of-the-art weapon system. Not the shot being the bioweapon.
Dont know what to make of this.
Can you please elaborate?
All of the redacted sections marked as (b)(4) refer to technology within a weapons system. the last redaction is followed by a statement on sterility.
I read that different agencies have their own set of redaction codes, so b4 from the National Archives likely means something different than b4 from the FDA.
EDIT: Even if it did relate to a weapon system, that does not mean the shot itself is a weapon system, but the redacted information could be related to a bioweapon.
Interesting note though, the last paragraph. Something just seems shady especially the redactions that lead up to **Sterilization...
The classification is in the image. And bio-weapons research in America is confined to defensive purposes only.
The image was from the National Archives. The redaction codes were from the Food and Drug Administration.
I don't understand what your Wikipedia link is supposed to show.
You being genuine with this? Read b4 statement. Its about INTERFERING (that would impaire) with a state-of-the-art weapon system. Not the shot being the bioweapon.
The title of this post is "The Jab is a confirmed WEAPON SYSTEM".