At most they would need attendance records. The lawyers are asking for years worth or report cards and other bullshit for only a few of the teachers and students. It looks like lawyers trying to make money through work for other lawyers, as lawyers tend to do.
Can't believe everyone here is on the sides of scummy lawyers for a gun company. Pretty fucked.
This is a nuisance lawsuit that legally should have been barred by the PLCAA, except the "scummy lawyers" for the plaintiff made up a bullshit story that they can prove Remington deliberately marketed their guns to attract the shooter. (Doubly ridiculous as the shooter didn't buy the gun, but stole it fr his mom)
Firearm makers are the only business that a court would even consider holding responsible for the criminal misuse of their product, as the concept is laughable and it's only allowed at all because people like you think gun makers are evil.
I support Remington making it as painful and costly as possible for these plaintiffs, as that was their only reason for bringing suit against Remington.
At most they would need attendance records. The lawyers are asking for years worth or report cards and other bullshit for only a few of the teachers and students. It looks like lawyers trying to make money through work for other lawyers, as lawyers tend to do.
Can't believe everyone here is on the sides of scummy lawyers for a gun company. Pretty fucked.
go fuck yourself
Ah yes, I'm a fucking Jew that hates lawyers. And you're a bigoted piece of shit.
Get fucked dumb cunt.
Would you like to spout out any more pre-canned NPC bullshit like a fucking child or are we done here?
Fucking douche nozzle with the fucking triggered.
Of course a guy with the handle richard nixon would be against guns lolololol.
Not at all. My dad has dozens and I love to go shooting with him.
This is a nuisance lawsuit that legally should have been barred by the PLCAA, except the "scummy lawyers" for the plaintiff made up a bullshit story that they can prove Remington deliberately marketed their guns to attract the shooter. (Doubly ridiculous as the shooter didn't buy the gun, but stole it fr his mom)
Firearm makers are the only business that a court would even consider holding responsible for the criminal misuse of their product, as the concept is laughable and it's only allowed at all because people like you think gun makers are evil.
I support Remington making it as painful and costly as possible for these plaintiffs, as that was their only reason for bringing suit against Remington.
I don't think the suit has any real merit, I can understand though why the parents would be upset.
I also know lawyers for huge corporations are fucking dickheads.
Why, you can't handle a different opinion than yours you fucking pussy?
Keep defending lawyers and big gun industry you cunt.