a) ALL represents predefined information for each ONEs perception within.
b) words as meaning are not offered by ALL, but shaped and suggested by other ONEs within ALL.
c) I do not intent to define words; I put them into perspective of natural law; which de-masquerades the contradictions in all suggested words...affixed meaning ignores perception of ongoing movement, and ignorance corrupts comprehension of perceived movement (inspiration); which is why the few suggest affixed meaning as words to the many; who consent by choice to believe suggested meaning (information) over perceived movement (inspiration).
Oh I am over the target on this one, as I got a reply from the word definer.
a) ALL represents predefined information for each ONEs perception within.
b) words as meaning are not offered by ALL, but shaped and suggested by other ONEs within ALL.
c) I do not intent to define words; I put them into perspective of natural law; which de-masquerades the contradictions in all suggested words...affixed meaning ignores perception of ongoing movement, and ignorance corrupts comprehension of perceived movement (inspiration); which is why the few suggest affixed meaning as words to the many; who consent by choice to believe suggested meaning (information) over perceived movement (inspiration).