They are helpful, but I also believe if you can limit the denominator enough it can be good enough data to make a decision based on.
2 NFL players out of 1700 so far with serious career ending injuries not long after being vaccinated. Injuries which correspond to the adverse reaction profile of the spike protein. At the same time no one lost their career from COVID-19 itself. I could just take those anecdotes alone and for me that is enough not to take it.
I think God gave us many signs such that we don't need the highest quality scientific studies to make a decision on this. But that data is there as I'm sure you know.
1.2% serious side effects. 24% notice side effects. Compare this to Covid 3-4% serious side effects which seems high until it consider that not everyone gets covid. Overall covid is like 0.04% prior odds serious.
It depends on how we define "serious" too. I'm not sure we are comparing apples to apples when looking at vaxx serious effects and COVID-19.
Any government data has too much bias built in too. VAERS reports are way under counting, while government collected COVID data is always over counting. So I think we may even be seeing more truth just by looking at professional athletes and other people in the public eye. They have no where to hide which eliminates some of the bias of the previous data collection. From those observations in the younger demographic it looks like vaxx serious injury compared to COVID could be 10x or 20x more. Maybe even worse than that.
And then there is the problem of industry backed adverse reaction studies. Those are what many people use but I don't trust those fraudsters whatsoever. I'd want a study by a University not funded by industry and done more recently so now they know more of what to look for. They should all do MRIs of the heart, take blood samples, look for microclots, etc.
Good dd. Anecdotes aren’t data but they’re helpful narrative since let’s face it the propaganda machine relies upon them.
They are helpful, but I also believe if you can limit the denominator enough it can be good enough data to make a decision based on.
2 NFL players out of 1700 so far with serious career ending injuries not long after being vaccinated. Injuries which correspond to the adverse reaction profile of the spike protein. At the same time no one lost their career from COVID-19 itself. I could just take those anecdotes alone and for me that is enough not to take it.
I think God gave us many signs such that we don't need the highest quality scientific studies to make a decision on this. But that data is there as I'm sure you know.
1.2% serious side effects. 24% notice side effects. Compare this to Covid 3-4% serious side effects which seems high until it consider that not everyone gets covid. Overall covid is like 0.04% prior odds serious.
It depends on how we define "serious" too. I'm not sure we are comparing apples to apples when looking at vaxx serious effects and COVID-19.
Any government data has too much bias built in too. VAERS reports are way under counting, while government collected COVID data is always over counting. So I think we may even be seeing more truth just by looking at professional athletes and other people in the public eye. They have no where to hide which eliminates some of the bias of the previous data collection. From those observations in the younger demographic it looks like vaxx serious injury compared to COVID could be 10x or 20x more. Maybe even worse than that.
And then there is the problem of industry backed adverse reaction studies. Those are what many people use but I don't trust those fraudsters whatsoever. I'd want a study by a University not funded by industry and done more recently so now they know more of what to look for. They should all do MRIs of the heart, take blood samples, look for microclots, etc.