So they have the evidence, but because this guy is arrested they can't publish it in any credible way?

At what point do we start to question the stories that confirm our own bias? Sure, ok, I know what you're thinking, this guy is a shill. I'm not. I'm just wondering if the lab where they tested the samples doesn't still have record of the test? I mean, would they not be required to confirm the results and thusly their credibility as a DNA testing lab in order for the proof that would have otherwise been presented to the public to withstand scrutiny?

No, it's more likely this guy got busted for trying to have sex with someone under the legal age and he's using Omar in an attempt to misdirect everyone's attention.