Well if you’ve been paying attention it goes beyond bad medical advice. For example in 2008 the WHO changing the definition of a pandemic from deaths to cases. Then the new concept in 2020 of mislabeling a case as someone who is sick. And then using a test which was never intended for clinical diagnosis to be used just as that - and here I’m referring to the PCR test. And to make matters worse, using a PCR test beyond 20 cycles which gives you about 50% false positives on up. We also have the CDC initially counting cases among both vaccinated and unvaccinated, and then on May 15 they again change their guidance to count all cases among unvaccinated and only hospitalized among vaccinated- again skewing the numbers. You can connect your own dot...
No, not pissed. I don't think what I wrote sounds that way.
My point is that this doctor is explaining the consequences of bad medical advice during a real pandemic. He is not saying it is a hoax.
Well if you’ve been paying attention it goes beyond bad medical advice. For example in 2008 the WHO changing the definition of a pandemic from deaths to cases. Then the new concept in 2020 of mislabeling a case as someone who is sick. And then using a test which was never intended for clinical diagnosis to be used just as that - and here I’m referring to the PCR test. And to make matters worse, using a PCR test beyond 20 cycles which gives you about 50% false positives on up. We also have the CDC initially counting cases among both vaccinated and unvaccinated, and then on May 15 they again change their guidance to count all cases among unvaccinated and only hospitalized among vaccinated- again skewing the numbers. You can connect your own dot...
Thank you for this information. I would like to hear Dr. Stock's opinion about what you wrote.