I'm in the "Informed Consent" camp and so far I feel we are not fully informed. That will only be that case after many years of trials (and honesty by the testers).
I'm not anti-vaccines, or anti-any-treatment-that-works.
As I tell people: I want to be wrong about all this but, at the moment, it is too early to make an assessment.
You do not force Uncle Ted to actually admit an error like how the CCP of all people was forced to with their decade long Antifa rampages, there will be bloody hell for you.
It's not too early to make an assessment. The "vaccines" aren't vaccines at all, they don't work for shit, and it would be unethical to give it to a lab rat.
Dr Z's protocol works such that over 97% of the people expected to die have no breathing problems within 2 days, never need to go to the hospital, don't need a ventilator, and don't die.
One can be generous and call it a preventative treatment. It might end up being an effective treatment.
So, while I don't think it is currently sufficiently effective and the side effects are worse than the disease, the experiment might yield sufficient data to improve the treatment.
"keep an open mind" is surely the motto of this forum.
One should be prepared to change position under new information.
Oh, I agree. It's a terrible and unethical idea, even if I was to be generous and accept good intentions.
But I do not. It is a manufactured crisis to simultaneously get Trump out of office, break the US economically and dethrone the USD as reserve currency. Other countries have gone along with it for their domestic power grabs.
I'm in the "Informed Consent" camp and so far I feel we are not fully informed. That will only be that case after many years of trials (and honesty by the testers).
I'm not anti-vaccines, or anti-any-treatment-that-works.
As I tell people: I want to be wrong about all this but, at the moment, it is too early to make an assessment.
I'm sure it is a scam. At most an opportunity too good to be missed.
My non-compliance will continue.
Yes, this is the whole point.
You do not force Uncle Ted to actually admit an error like how the CCP of all people was forced to with their decade long Antifa rampages, there will be bloody hell for you.
"Decade long antifa rampages," what?
I'm referring to this incident. If you want to know what Red Guards are they are effectively just Antifa, just Chinese.
It's not too early to make an assessment. The "vaccines" aren't vaccines at all, they don't work for shit, and it would be unethical to give it to a lab rat.
Dr Z's protocol works such that over 97% of the people expected to die have no breathing problems within 2 days, never need to go to the hospital, don't need a ventilator, and don't die.
No vaccine has ever been that successful.
This was all known by April 2020.
One can be generous and call it a preventative treatment. It might end up being an effective treatment.
So, while I don't think it is currently sufficiently effective and the side effects are worse than the disease, the experiment might yield sufficient data to improve the treatment.
"keep an open mind" is surely the motto of this forum.
One should be prepared to change position under new information.
It's still a bad idea. Dr Z's protocol proved itself more effective than any vaccine in history by April 2020.
Oh, I agree. It's a terrible and unethical idea, even if I was to be generous and accept good intentions.
But I do not. It is a manufactured crisis to simultaneously get Trump out of office, break the US economically and dethrone the USD as reserve currency. Other countries have gone along with it for their domestic power grabs.