37
Comments (17)
sorted by:
4
the-new-style 4 points ago +5 / -1

I'm in the "Informed Consent" camp and so far I feel we are not fully informed. That will only be that case after many years of trials (and honesty by the testers).

I'm not anti-vaccines, or anti-any-treatment-that-works.

As I tell people: I want to be wrong about all this but, at the moment, it is too early to make an assessment.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
5
the-new-style 5 points ago +5 / -0

I'm sure it is a scam. At most an opportunity too good to be missed.

My non-compliance will continue.

2
Mrexreturns 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, this is the whole point.

You do not force Uncle Ted to actually admit an error like how the CCP of all people was forced to with their decade long Antifa rampages, there will be bloody hell for you.

2
CIAMM 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's not too early to make an assessment. The "vaccines" aren't vaccines at all, they don't work for shit, and it would be unethical to give it to a lab rat.

Dr Z's protocol works such that over 97% of the people expected to die have no breathing problems within 2 days, never need to go to the hospital, don't need a ventilator, and don't die.

No vaccine has ever been that successful.

This was all known by April 2020.

1
the-new-style 1 point ago +1 / -0

One can be generous and call it a preventative treatment. It might end up being an effective treatment.

So, while I don't think it is currently sufficiently effective and the side effects are worse than the disease, the experiment might yield sufficient data to improve the treatment.

"keep an open mind" is surely the motto of this forum.

One should be prepared to change position under new information.

1
CIAMM 1 point ago +1 / -0

the experiment might yield sufficient data to improve the treatment.

It's still a bad idea. Dr Z's protocol proved itself more effective than any vaccine in history by April 2020.

3
the-new-style 3 points ago +3 / -0

Oh, I agree. It's a terrible and unethical idea, even if I was to be generous and accept good intentions.

But I do not. It is a manufactured crisis to simultaneously get Trump out of office, break the US economically and dethrone the USD as reserve currency. Other countries have gone along with it for their domestic power grabs.

1
PublicWifi 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'll wait it out.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-1
Mrexreturns -1 points ago +4 / -5

I told you so.

The end goal is exactly like what I said.

Lockdowns until people regress into cannibal beasts and exterminate each other as the elite ascends into Gods.

None believed me. Now you WILL see it happen.

2
Oldmancountry17 2 points ago +2 / -0

I like mine with lettuce and tomato, Heinz 57 and French fries potato.

Told you so? Mankind wont eat each other. Well, maybe in the cities, but there is a shitload of rural.

1
Mrexreturns 1 point ago +2 / -1

I'm talking about a full blown civilization collapse with the complete demolition and the humiliation of the America empire and WWIII and Agenda 21 in full blown action.

2
CIAMM 2 points ago +2 / -0

Your ideas may be the goal for the far east, but I doubt it. They don't want or need super humans, they've been actively creating a sub-species.

The goal for North America is to revert it back to wilderness.

-1
Mrexreturns -1 points ago +1 / -2

Not just for the Far East, it's for all of us. Civilization as a whole.

The shit I espouse will happen for the sake of conditioning, and the reversion back to wilderness happens later, simultaneously worldwide.