Could Michael Jackson have been framed to be a predator by people who are actually predators? After all, there is a quote attributed to Karl Marx that states to "accuse the other side of what you are doing," so it could very well be possible that they did the same thing to a man who's childhood was stolen and was never able to grow up mentally out from it as a sacrificial lamb to make the people think that the predators are being stopped, but in reality, have been able to get away. Is it possible that he was framed for alleged predatory acts, and perhaps even disposed of because of becoming more of a liability than an asset?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (63)
sorted by:
I don't trust people. My choices have nothing to do with the media circus surrounding Michael Jackson being part of an organized smear campaign against him.
When you have children that aren’t yours playing slumber party at your house for years, I don’t think that should have been happening. If this was a setup, then 90% of the setup he did himself.
If I wanted to prevent people from drawing false accusations I wouldn’t have unsupervised small children stay at my house all the time for years. I used to work at a after school program for kids. We had cameras everywhere. The place was in a town with a 40,000 population. You’re saying he couldn’t afford some cameras to instantly prove those kids were safe at all times?
I get that people get falsely accused but we shouldn’t be encouraging this kind of behavior. Even if he didn’t do it, it’s normalizating behavior that should not be acceptable. You want a bunch of unsupervised kids around you? Have people, have cameras and accountability. Otherwise it’s encouraging kids into compromising situations where they could get raped
This does not persuade me that he was a pedophile or that he was negligent. Why do you think they were "playing slumber party" when he had them over? I knew a couple of people who stayed at famous peoples' houses when they were young. I didn't think they were being molested.
Call me old fashioned, but I think it’s inappropriate to have your young children spend the night over at a mans private residence who’s not a relative.
I’m not saying or convincing anyone he did it. I’m just saying he brought suspicions on himself via stupid behavior.
He could have eliminated it with chaperones, parents, relatives, accountability, or just by not making a theme park at his house to lure kids over for slumber parties.
Michael admitted to the slumber parties, that’s not up for debate. He says they slept over and didn’t do anything sexual. Maybe so, but the parents and Michael did badly on how the organized and executed their situation.
I'm not an expert, but I have never seen Michael Jackson say he had a slumber party.
I have had people at my house. I wouldn't call any of those times a "slumber party." Are you sure you're characterizing this properly?